The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National Institutional Systems as Antecedents of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study: FEMALE REPRESENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS
Open accessAbstract
Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: How are national institutional systems related to the proportion of women found on corporate boards of directors of companies listed in particular countries? Which particular types of national institutions play the most important role? We explore cross-country variation in the pattern of female representation on corporate boards and evaluate the extent to which it is associated with the nature of national institutional systems as captured in five frameworks each of which emphasizes the importance of a distinct type of national institutions. Our analysis includes 38 countries and covers the years 2001–07. Research Findings/Insights: Our findings show that as much as half of the variation in the presence of women on corporate boards across countries is attributable to national institutional systems and that culturally and legally-oriented institutional systems appear to play the most significant role in shaping board diversity. Theoretical/Academic Implications: Our study suggests that country-level institutions, previously neglected in studies of board diversity, play an important role in shaping the prevalence of women on corporate boards and that these need to be more fully incorporated in future research on board diversity. Practitioner/Policy Implications: The importance of national institutional systems for board diversity suggests that policy levers of a regulatory nature and national cultural characteristics are important elements in driving corporate board diversity and offer distinct opportunities for tailoring a mix of corporate governance interventions that suit the particular institutional nature of a given country.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250042 · Cited by 18,025
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
Porter, P. K., Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040740 · Cited by 7,510
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092
Law and FinancePreprint
Porta, R. L., de Silanes, F. L., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 2,957
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y · Cited by 2,209
Botero, J. C., Djankov, S., Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/0033553042476215 · Cited by 2,124
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00179 · Cited by 1,783
Cited by
Board Composition Beyond Independence: Social Capital, Human Capital, and Demographics
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312463938 · Cited by 616
Unlocking sustainable governance: The role of women at the corporate apex
Zaccone, M. C. (2024) · Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12637 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-135
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120812555
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Institutional Systems as Antecedents of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study: FEMALE REPRESENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
- The paper
- Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National Institutional Systems as Antecedents of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study: FEMALE REPRESENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.