The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Person Perception and Personality Pathology
Open accessAbstract
Studies of person perception (people's impressions and beliefs about others) have developed important concepts and methods that can be used to help improve the assessment of personality disorders. They may also inspire advances in our knowledge of the nature and origins of these conditions. Information collected from peers and other types of informants is reliable and provides a perspective that often differs substantially from that obtained using questionnaires and interviews. For some purposes, this information is quite useful. Much remains to be learned about the incremental validity (and potential biases) associated with data from various kinds of informants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Adult Psychopathology: Meta-Analyses and Implications of Cross-Informant Correlations.
Achenbach, T. M., Krukowski, R. A., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.361 · Cited by 406
Informant-reports of personality disorder: relation to self-reports and future research directions
Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.300 · Cited by 314
Self-citation
Cited by
Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020327 · Cited by 2,677
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model.
Vazire, S. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017908 · Cited by 1,080
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder
Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131215 · Cited by 1,082
Principles Underlying the Use of Multiple Informants' Reports
De Los Reyes, A., Thomas, S. A., Goodman, K. L., & Kundey, S. M. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-36
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2051997070
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Person Perception and Personality Pathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01601.x
- The paper
- Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2009). Person Perception and Personality Pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01601.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
