The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of Sound for Cognitive Sequencing Abilities: The Auditory Scaffolding Hypothesis
Abstract
Sound is inherently a temporal and sequential signal. Experience with sound therefore may help bootstrap—that is, provide a kind of “scaffolding” for—the development of general cognitive abilities related to representing temporal or sequential patterns. Accordingly, the absence of sound early in development may result in disturbances to these sequencing skills. In support of this hypothesis, we present two types of findings. First, normal-hearing adults do best on sequencing tasks when the sense of hearing, rather than sight, can be used. Second, recent findings suggest that deaf children have disturbances on exactly these same kinds of tasks that involve learning and manipulation of serial-order information. We suggest that sound provides an “auditory scaffolding” for time and serial-order behavior, possibly mediated through neural connections between the temporal and frontal lobes of the brain. Under conditions of auditory deprivation, auditory scaffolding is absent, resulting in neural reorganization and a disturbance to cognitive sequencing abilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensory modality can constrain higher-level cognition, including learning and memory.
“Research in cognitive psychology has shown that sensory modality can constrain higher-level cognition, including learning and memory (Conway et al., 2009).”
From Aptitude for Explicit and Implicit Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Conway et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech perception as a multimodal phenomenon
Rosenblum, L. D. (2008) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00615.x · Cited by 193
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1196/annals.1416.009 · DOI
- Lashley K.S., 1951, Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, 112
- Myklebust H.R., 1953, Acta Oto-Laryngologica Supplementum, 105, 1
- 10.1097/00003446-200002000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03201243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24 · DOI
- 10.1080/09541440802097951 · DOI
- 10.1093/deafed/enm019 · DOI
- Conway C.M., Pisoni D.B., Anaya E.M., Karpicke J., Henning S.C. (in press). Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants. Developmental Science .
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/064) · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1730169100 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00285-9 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03199576 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0011 · DOI
- Hirsh I.J., 1967, Brain mechanisms underlying speech and language, 21
- Korkman M., 1998, NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment
- 10.1080/09541440500216028 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03202613 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01688639008400968 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax
Kidd, E. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025405 · Cited by 310
Aptitude for Explicit and Implicit Learning
Pavlekovic, R., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2024) · Journal of the European Second Language Association · doi:10.22599/jesla.117 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Conway, C. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Kronenberger, W. G.
- Affiliations
- Saint Louis University
- Indiana University, Bloomington
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 275-279
- ISSN
- 0963-7214
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2923391
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
