Cited by 561Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Identity and RepresentationSocial Representations and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Context of Social Identity: Domination, Resistance, and Change

Reicher, Stephen·2004·Political Psychology

Abstract

The task of social psychology is to explain the flexibility of human beings in creating and relating to their social worlds. Social identity and self‐categorization theories provide a thoroughgoing interactionist framework for achieving such a task. However, in order to do so, it is necessary to avoid reductionist misreadings of the theories that would explain human social action simply by reference to psychological processes, without examining how the play of process depends on the cultural and structural settings in which they occur. More specifically, to the extent that self‐categories shape social action, flexibility is achieved through the categories to which we belong, the others with whom we compare ourselves, and the dimensions along which such comparisons occur. These are not a fixed aspect of the human condition but are a focus for argument precisely because of their world‐making consequences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Barrows S., 1981, Distorting mirrors
  2. Bartlett F. C., 1932, Remembering
  3. Billig M., 1987, Arguing and thinking
  4. Billig M., 1996, Banal nationalism
  5. Campbell D., 1992, Writing security
  6. Eagleton T., 1996, Ideology
  7. Emler N., 1995, Adolescence and delinquency
  8. 10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1222 · DOI
  9. Lewontin R. C., 1993, The doctrine of DNA
  10. Pynchon T., 1972, Gravity’s rainbow
  11. Reicher S., 1986, Contact, conflict and intergroup encounters, 152
  12. Reicher S., 2001, Self and nation
  13. Reicher S., 1997, Stereotyping and social identity, 94
  14. Reicher S., 1997, Ethnic stereotypes and national purity, no. 20 of DQR Studies in Literature, 53
  15. 10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.267 · DOI
  16. Renan E., 1990, Nation and narration, 8
  17. Reynolds K. J., 2001, Us and them: Understanding the psychology of prejudice and racism, 159
  18. Turner J. C., 1999, Social identity: Context, commitment, content, 6
  19. Turner J., 1978, Differentiation between social groups, 201
  20. Wallerstein I., 1991, Race, nation, class, 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 561

Metadata

Authors
Reicher, S.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Reicher, Stephen
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-10
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
921-945
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W1997507210
Cited by
559
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
43.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
social identity, self-categorization theory, domination, resistance, social change, interactionism, cultural context, structural context, social comparison, world-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review