The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark
Abstract
The ability of a political system to respond to the preferences of its citizens is central to democratic theory and practice; yet most empirical research on government responsiveness has concentrated on the United States. As a result, we know very little about the nature of government policy responsiveness in Europe and we have a poor understanding of the conditions that affect cross-national variations. This comparative study examines the relationship between public opinion and policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Denmark during the past three decades. We address two key questions: First, are the government's policy intentions driven by public opinion or vice versa? Second, do political institutions influence the level of government responsiveness? We suggest that public opinion tends to drive the government's policy intentions due to the threat of electoral sanction, and that this is more pronounced in proportional systems than in majoritarian democracies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267990 · Cited by 9,537
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Spurious regressions in econometrics
Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7 · Cited by 6,200
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961840 · Cited by 4,011
Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-4738 · Cited by 2,990
Constituency Influence in Congress
Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952717 · Cited by 2,293
Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries
LIJPHART, A. (1984) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t · Cited by 2,165
Elections as instruments of democracy: majoritarian and proportional visions
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2390 · Cited by 1,823
Cited by
Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective
Binzer Hobolt, S., & Klemmensen, R. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414006297169 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmemsen, R.
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-402
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2105669779
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00534.x
- The paper
- Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmemsen, R. (2005). Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00534.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.