The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education
Abstract
This article draws upon and contributes to a body of theory and research within political science which is concerned with changes in the policy process and new methods of governing society; that is, with a shift from centralised and bureaucratic government to governance in and by networks. This is sometimes called the ‘Anglo-governance model’ and the most prominent and influential figure in the field is Rod Rhodes. The article focuses on one aspect of these kinds of change within the field of education policy and argues that a new form of ‘experimental’ and ‘strategic’ governance is being fostered, based upon network relations among new policy communities. These new policy communities bring new kinds of actors into the policy process, validate new policy discourses and enable new forms of policy influence and enactment, and in some respects disable or disenfranchise established actors and agencies. The argument is illustrated with examples of networks identified and mapped by the author. Some of the relationships among participants who make up these new networks are traced and discussed, drawing upon research into the privatisation of education funded by the ESRC. These relationships interlink business, philanthropy, quangos and non-governmental agencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The New Governance: Governing without Government
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x · Cited by 4,317
Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 3,816
Mills, C. W. (1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,631
Osborne, D. (1993) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3381012 · Cited by 2,273
The Future of the Capitalist State.
Jessop, R. (2002) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 2,081
Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector
Kickert, W., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (1997) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446217658 · Cited by 1,690
The Future of the Capitalist State
(2005) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981680508600115 · Cited by 1,544
(1950) · Nature · doi:10.1038/165838c0 · Cited by 1,491
Policy Networks in British Government
(1992) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198278528.001.0001 · Cited by 1,414
Education Reform: A Critical and Post-Structural Approach
Flew, A., & Ball, S. J. (1995) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121942 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citation
Cited by
Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self‐evaluation
Ozga, J. (2009) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680930902733121 · Cited by 615
A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review
Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3239 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, S. J.
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 747-765
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2152448392
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 64.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x
- The paper
- Ball, S. J. (2008). New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.