The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that animals share with adult humans and perhaps human infants a system for representing objective number as psychological magnitudes that are an analogue of the quantities they represent. Here we show that rhesus monkeys can extend a numerical rule learned with the values 1 through 9 to the values 10, 15, 20, and 30, which suggests that there is no upper limit on a monkey's numerical capacity. Instead, throughout the numerical range tested, both accuracy and latency in ordering two numerical values were systematically controlled by the ratio of the values compared. In a second experiment, we directly compared humans' and monkeys' performance in the same ordinal comparison task. The qualitative and quantitative similarity in their performance provides the strongest evidence to date of a single nonverbal, evolutionarily primitive mechanism for representing and comparing numerical values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Cited by
Perdue, B. M., Talbot, C. F., Stone, A. M., & Beran, M. J. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0521-y · Cited by 115
Exploring Numeracy in Word Embeddings
Naik, A., Ravichander, A., Rose, C., & Hovy, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1329 · Cited by 49
Snyder, R. J., Barrett, L. P., Emory, R. A., & Perdue, B. M. (2021) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01504-5 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 401-406
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2170328124
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.x
- The paper
- Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.