Cited by 204Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First Impressions and Last Resorts: How Listeners Adjust to Speaker Variability

Kraljic, Tanya, Samuel, Arthur G., Brennan, Susan E.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

Perceptual theories must explain how perceivers extract meaningful information from a continuously variable physical signal. In the case of speech, the puzzle is that little reliable acoustic invariance seems to exist. We tested the hypothesis that speech-perception processes recover invariants not about the signal, but rather about the source that produced the signal. Findings from two manipulations suggest that the system learns those properties of speech that result from idiosyncratic characteristics of the speaker; the same properties are not learned when they can be attributed to incidental factors. We also found evidence for how the system determines what is characteristic: In the absence of other information about the speaker, the system relies on episodic order, representing those properties present during early experience as characteristic of the speaker. This “first-impressions” bias can be overridden, however, when variation is an incidental consequence of a temporary state (a pen in the speaker's mouth), rather than characteristic of the speaker.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Readers and listeners continually update their expectations about the likelihood of encountering some stimulus based on their exposure to the statistical regularities of a specific experimental context.

    “Whether in the domain of speech perception (Kleinschmidt & Jaeger 2011; Kraljic et al. 2008), syntactic processing (Farmer et al. 2011; Fine et al. under review; Wells et al. 2009), prosody (Kurumada et al. 2012), or pragmatics (Grodner & Sedivy 2011), it has become increasingly apparent that readers and listeners continually update their expectations about the likelihood of encountering”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1068/p3016 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90025-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90015-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0140525X97000022 · DOI
  6. 10.3115/980262.980272 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/368542a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00223980.1966.10543777 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/1572424 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0010-0277(96)81418-1 · DOI
  13. Kraljic T., Cognition
  14. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.001 · DOI
  15. 10.3758/BF03193841 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 · DOI
  17. Maye J., Cognitive Science
  18. 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9 · DOI
  19. Rock I., 1983, The logic of perception

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
332-338
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2112464722
Cited by
204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 51663)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD052342)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
speech perception, first impressions, speaker characteristics, acoustic variability, perceptual learning, perceptual categorization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attitude, Humans, Phonetics, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review