The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First Impressions and Last Resorts: How Listeners Adjust to Speaker Variability
Abstract
Perceptual theories must explain how perceivers extract meaningful information from a continuously variable physical signal. In the case of speech, the puzzle is that little reliable acoustic invariance seems to exist. We tested the hypothesis that speech-perception processes recover invariants not about the signal, but rather about the source that produced the signal. Findings from two manipulations suggest that the system learns those properties of speech that result from idiosyncratic characteristics of the speaker; the same properties are not learned when they can be attributed to incidental factors. We also found evidence for how the system determines what is characteristic: In the absence of other information about the speaker, the system relies on episodic order, representing those properties present during early experience as characteristic of the speaker. This “first-impressions” bias can be overridden, however, when variation is an incidental consequence of a temporary state (a pen in the speaker's mouth), rather than characteristic of the speaker.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Readers and listeners continually update their expectations about the likelihood of encountering some stimulus based on their exposure to the statistical regularities of a specific experimental context.
“Whether in the domain of speech perception (Kleinschmidt & Jaeger 2011; Kraljic et al. 2008), syntactic processing (Farmer et al. 2011; Fine et al. under review; Wells et al. 2009), prosody (Kurumada et al. 2012), or pragmatics (Grodner & Sedivy 2011), it has become increasingly apparent that readers and listeners continually update their expectations about the likelihood of encountering”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Kraljic et al. 2008
Citations
Cites
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small
Elman, J. L. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90058-4 · Cited by 1,988
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1068/p3016 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914 · DOI
- 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90025-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90015-6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X97000022 · DOI
- 10.3115/980262.980272 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/368542a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/00223980.1966.10543777 · DOI
- 10.2307/1572424 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(96)81418-1 · DOI
- Kraljic T., Cognition
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.001 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193841 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 · DOI
- Maye J., Cognitive Science
- 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9 · DOI
- Rock I., 1983, The logic of perception
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Diego
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 332-338
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2112464722
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 51663)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD052342)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- speech perception, first impressions, speaker characteristics, acoustic variability, perceptual learning, perceptual categorization
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attitude, Humans, Phonetics, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review