The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition
Open accessAbstract
It is well known that there exist preferred landing positions for eye fixations in visual word recognition. However, the existence of preferred landing positions in face recognition is less well established. It is also unknown how many fixations are required to recognize a face. To investigate these questions, we recorded eye movements during face recognition. During an otherwise standard face-recognition task, subjects were allowed a variable number of fixations before the stimulus was masked. We found that optimal recognition performance is achieved with two fixations; performance does not improve with additional fixations. The distribution of the first fixation is just to the left of the center of the nose, and that of the second fixation is around the center of the nose. Thus, these appear to be the preferred landing positions for face recognition. Furthermore, the fixations made during face learning differ in location from those made during face recognition and are also more variable in duration; this suggests that different strategies are used for face learning and face recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Cited by
(2016) · doi:10.3389/fpsyg · Cited by 801
Eye movements during emotion recognition in faces
Schurgin, M. W., Nelson, J., Iida, S., Ohira, H., Chiao, J. Y., & Franconeri, S. L. (2014) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/14.13.14 · Cited by 334
Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology
Rossion, B. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 · Cited by 314
Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks
Peterson, M. F., & Eckstein, M. P. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1214269109 · Cited by 314
Speech Disturbs Face Scanning in 6-Month-Old Infants Who Develop Autism Spectrum Disorder
Shic, F., Macari, S., & Chawarska, K. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.009 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsiao, J. H.-W., & Cottrell, G.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 998-1006
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W1981158516
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x
- The paper
- Hsiao, J. H.-W., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.