The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgments
Open accessAbstract
Theories of moral judgment have long emphasized reasoning and conscious thought while downplaying the role of intuitive and contextual influences. However, recent research has demonstrated that incidental feelings of disgust can influence moral judgments and make them more severe. This study involved two experiments demonstrating that the reverse effect can occur when the notion of physical purity is made salient, thus making moral judgments less severe. After having the cognitive concept of cleanliness activated (Experiment 1) or after physically cleansing themselves after experiencing disgust (Experiment 2), participants found certain moral actions to be less wrong than did participants who had not been exposed to a cleanliness manipulation. The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning. One of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.613 · Cited by 1,700
Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208317771 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationLewis, M. D., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2000) · Cited by 1,304
Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130726 · Cited by 1,169
(2006) · Cited by 1,041
Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x · Cited by 959
Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x · Cited by 851
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Cited by
Mirror, Mirror on my Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0411 · Cited by 946
Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x · Cited by 414
Yong, E. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/485298a · Cited by 405
Weight as an Embodiment of Importance
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x · Cited by 401
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107286184 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1219-1222
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2146430341
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x
- The paper
- Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgments. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
