Cited by 70Higher Education Research StudiesMedical Education and AdmissionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Individual Differences in Course Choice Result in Underestimation of the Validity of College Admissions Systems

Berry, Christopher M., Sackett, Paul R.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

We demonstrate that the validity of SAT scores and high school grade point averages (GPAs) as predictors of academic performance has been underestimated because of previous studies' reliance on flawed performance indicators (i.e., college GPA) that are contaminated by the effects of individual differences in course choice. We controlled for this contamination by predicting individual course grades, instead of GPAs, in a data set containing more than 5 million college grades for 167,816 students. Percentage of variance accounted for by SAT scores and high school GPAs was 30 to 40% lower when the criteria were freshman and cumulative GPAs than when the criteria were individual course grades. SAT scores and high school GPAs together accounted for between 44 and 62% of the variance in college grades. This study provides new estimates of the criterion-related validity of SAT scores and high school GPAs, and highlights the care that must be taken in choosing appropriate criteria in validity studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02368.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standardized tests and high school GPA show substantial validity for predicting first-year college GPA and degree completion.

    “These predictors show substantial validity for predicting various relevant outcomes, including first-year college GPA and degree completion (Berry & Sackett, 2009;Kuncel & Hezlett, 2010).”
  • The criterion (FGPA) is an imperfect measure of academic success; it aggregates performance across heterogeneous majors, courses, and instructors, reflecting not only students' knowledge and skills but also course composition and grading practices.

    “Second, the criterion is an imperfect measure of academic success; FGPA aggregates performance across heterogeneous majors, courses, and instructors, reflecting not only students' knowledge and skills but also course composition and grading practices (Berry & Sackett, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berry, C. M., & Sackett, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
822-830
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2093150504
Cited by
68
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
26.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
course selection, individual differences, criterion validity, SAT scores, high school grade point average, college grades, university admission, student performance prediction, validity evidence, course grades
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Choice Behavior, College Admission Test, Curriculum, Educational Status, Humans, School Admission Criteria, Students, Universities, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review