CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 313Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health Research TopicsFlow Experience in Various Fields

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accounting for the Richness of Daily Activities

White, Mathew P., Dolan, Paul·2009·Psychological Science
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Serious consideration is being given to the impact of private behavior and public policies on people's subjective well-being (SWB). A new approach to measuring well-being, the day reconstruction method (DRM), weights the affective component of daily activities by their duration in order to construct temporal aggregates. However, the DRM neglects the potentially important role of thoughts. By adapting this method to include thoughts as well as feelings, we provide perhaps the most comprehensive measure of SWB to date. We show that some activities relatively low in pleasure (e.g., work and time with children) are nonetheless thought of as rewarding and therefore contribute to overall SWB. Such information may be important to policymakers wishing to promote behaviors that are conducive to a broader conception of SWB.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Diener E., 2008, Accounts of well-being for policy use
  2. Diener E., 1999, Psychological Review, 125, 276
  3. Harsanyi J.C., 1982, Utilitarianism and beyond, 39
  4. Kahneman D., 2006, A focusing illusion. Science, 312, 1908
  5. Schwarz N., 1999, Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, 61
  6. Seligman M.E.P., 2002, Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment
  7. Snijders T.A.B., 1999, Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 313

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
White, M. P., & Dolan, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
White, Mathew P.
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1000-1008
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x
OpenAlex
W2130640432
Cited by
310
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
subjective well-being, Day Reconstruction Method, daily activities, emotional experience, temporal aggregation, pleasure, work, time with children, public policy, private behavior
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Data Collection, Female, Goals, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Policy Making, Quality of Life, Reward, Thinking, Time Factors, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review