The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The future of open innovation
Open accessAbstract
Institutional openness is becoming increasingly popular in practice and academia: open innovation, open R&D and open business models. Our special issue builds on the concepts, underlying assumptions and implications discussed in two previous R&D Management special issues (2006, 2009). This overview indicates nine perspectives needed to develop an open innovation theory more fully. It also assesses some of the recent evidence that has come to light about open innovation, in theory and in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x · Cited by 1,410
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00287 · Cited by 681
Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation
West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710802033734 · Cited by 497
Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817 · cited 1×
“…on innovation’s downstream-side started with lead users’ involvement in the innovation process (von Hippel, 1988), the availability of toolkits (von Hippel and Katz, 2002) and the idea of mass customization (Franke and Piller, 2003), while involving the quasi-political concept of democratizing…”
Background
Cited by
Open innovation: The next decade
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 · Cited by 872
Self-citationOpen innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises
Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9 · Cited by 631
Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation
Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12471 · Cited by 486
Self-citationWhen Is Open Innovation Beneficial? The Role of Strategic Orientation
Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12148 · Cited by 485
Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.003 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-221
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W1726621761
- Cited by
- 1,690
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 236.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The future of open innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x
- The paper
- Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
