Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment

NOCKE, VOLKER, YEAPLE, STEPHEN·2008·Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

We develop an assignment theory to analyse the volume and composition of foreign direct investment (FDI). Firms conduct FDI by either engaging in greenfield investment or in cross-border acquisitions. Cross-border acquisitions involve firms trading heterogeneous corporate assets to exploit complementarities, while greenfield FDI involves setting up a new production division in the foreign country. In equilibrium, greenfield FDI and cross-border acquisitions coexist within the same industry, but the composition of FDI between these modes varies with firm and country characteristics. Firms engaging in greenfield investment are systematically more efficient than those engaging in cross-border acquisitions. Furthermore, most FDI takes the form of cross-border acquisitions when production-cost differences between countries are small, while greenfield investment plays a more important role for FDI from high-cost into low-cost countries. These results capture important features of the data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00480.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1162/003355303322552829 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.1.31 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1086/383099 · DOI · Paper page
  4. CAVES R.E, 1998, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1947
  5. J. EATON, S. KORTUM, and F KRAMARZ . (2004 ), "Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Destinations" (NBER Working Paper No. 10344, National Bureau of Economic Research). · DOI
  6. GABAIX X., 2007, "Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?"
  7. 10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00072-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. GROSSMAN G.M., 2000, American Economic Review, 90, 1255, 10.1257/aer.90.5.1255 · doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1255
  9. HEAD K., 2007, Journal of International Economics
  10. 10.1086/261236 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1257/000282804322970698 · doi:10.1257/000282804322970698
  12. 10.1111/0022-1082.00398 · DOI · Paper page
  13. MATALONI R.J.J., 2002, Survey of Current Business, 82, 24
  14. 10.1111/1468-0262.00467 · DOI · Paper page
  15. M.J. MELITZ, and G OTTAVIANO . (2005 ), "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity" (NBER Working Paper No. 11393, National Bureau of Economic Research). · doi:10.3386/w11393
  16. NEARY P, 2007, "Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage", 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00466.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.09.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
NOCKE, V., & YEAPLE, S.
Venue
Review of Economic Studies
Published
2008-04
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
529-557
ISSN
  • 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-937X
OpenAlex
W3124615324
Cited by
238
References
3
FWCI
50.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00480.x
The paper
NOCKE, V., & YEAPLE, S. (2008). An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00480.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.