Cited by 1,194Global trade and economicsGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactInternational Business and FDI

Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure

Open access
Antras, P.·2003·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Roughly one-third of world trade is intrafirm trade.This paper starts by unveiling two systematic patterns in the volume of intrafirm trade.In a panel of industries, the share of intrafirm imports in total U.S. imports is significantly higher, the higher the capital intensity of the exporting industry.In a cross-section of countries, the share of intrafirm imports in total U.S. imports is significantly higher, the higher the capital-labor ratio of the exporting country.I then show that these patterns can be rationalized in a theoretical framework that combines a Grossman-Hart-Moore view of the firm with a Helpman-Krugman view of international trade.In particular, I develop an incompletecontracting, property-rights model of the boundaries of the firm, which I then incorporate into a standard trade model with imperfect competition and product differentiation.The model pins down the boundaries of multinational firms as well as the international location of production, and it is shown to predict the patterns of intrafirm trade identified above.Econometric evidence reveals that the model is consistent with other qualitative and quantitative features of the data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355303322552829

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Aghion, Philippe, Mathias Dewatripont and Patrick Rey (1994), "Renegotiation Design with Unverifiable Information," Econometrica, 62:2, pp. 257-282.
  2. Aoki, Masahiko (1990), "Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm," Journal of Economic Literature, 28:1, pp. 1-27.
  3. Brainard, S. Lael (1997), "An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-off Between Multinational Sales and Trade," American Economic Review, 87:4, pp. 520-544.
  4. Caves, Richard E. (1996), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Che, Yeon-Koo and Donald B. Hausch (1999), "Cooperative Investments and the Value of Contracting," American Economic Review, 89:1, pp. 125-147.
  6. Coase, Ronald H. (1937), "The Nature of the Firm," Economica, 4:16, pp. 386-405.
  7. Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper (1992), "The Anatomy of Industry R&D Inten- sity Distributions," American Economic Review, 82:4, pp. 773-799.
  8. Dunning, John H. (1993), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
  9. Ethier, Wilfred J. (1986), "The Multinational Firm," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101:4, pp. 805-833.
  10. Ethier, Wilfred J. and James R. Markusen (1996), "Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade," Journal of International Economics, 41:1, pp. 1-28.
  11. Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart (1986), "The Costs and Benefits of Own- ership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration," Journal of Political Economy, 94:4, pp. 691-719.
  12. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman (2002a), "Integration vs. Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117:1, pp. 85-120.
  13. Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones (1999), "Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?" Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114:1, pp. 83-116.
  14. Hart, Oliver (1995), Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  15. Hart, Oliver and John Moore (1990), "Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, 98:6, pp. 1119-1158.
  16. Helpman, Elhanan (1984), "A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations", Journal of Political Economy, 92:3, pp. 451-471.
  17. Helpman, Elhanan and Paul R. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  18. Holmström Bengt and Paul Milgrom (1994), "The Firm as an Incentive System,", American Economic Review, 84:4, pp. 972-991.
  19. McLaren, John (2000), "Globalization and Vertical Structure," American Economic Review, 90:5, pp. 1239-1254.
  20. Markusen, James R. (1984), "Multinationals, Multi-Plant Economies, and the Gains from Trade" Journal of International Economics, 16, pp. 205-226.
  21. Markusen, James R. (1995), "The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9:2, pp. 169-189.
  22. Markusen, James R. and Keith E. Maskus (2001), "General-Equilibrium Approaches to the Multinational Firm: A Review of Theory and Evidence," forthcoming in Harrigan, James, ed. Handbook of International Trade, Basil Blackwell.
  23. Mundell, Robert A. (1957), "International Trade and Factor Mobility," American Eco- nomic Review, 47:3, pp. 321-335.
  24. Nöldeke, Georg and Klaus M. Schmidt (1995), "Option Contracts and Renegotiation: A Solution to the Hold-up Problem," RAND Journal of Economics, 26:2, pp. 163-179.
  25. Rugman, Alan M. (1981), Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Mar- kets, New York: Columbia University Press.
  26. Tirole, Jean (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  27. Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press.
  28. Zhang, Kevin H. and James R. Markusen (2001), "Vertical Multinationals and Host- Country Characteristics," Journal of Development Economics, 59:2, pp. 233-252.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antras, P.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
1375-1418
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2134499434
Cited by
1,194
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 75
FWCI
78.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Division of Chemistry
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
intra-firm trade, multinational corporations, incomplete contracts, property rights, firm boundaries, capital intensity, capital-labor ratio, imperfect competition, product differentiation, trade structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review