Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a work addiction scale

ANDREASSEN, CECILIE SCHOU, GRIFFITHS, MARK D, HETLAND, JØRN, PALLESEN, STÅLE·2012·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J. & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 265–272. Research into excessive work has gained increasing attention over the last 20 years. Terms such as “workaholism,”“work addiction” and “excessive work” have been used interchangeably. Given the increase in empirical research, this study presents the development of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS), a new psychometrically validated scale for the assessment of work addiction. A pool of 14 items, with two reflecting each of seven core elements of addiction (i.e., salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, relapse, and problems) was initially constructed. The items were then administered to two samples, one recruited by a web survey following a television broadcast about workaholism (n = 11,769) and one comprising participants in the second wave of a longitudinal internet‐based survey about working life (n = 368). The items with the highest corrected item‐total correlation from within each of the seven addiction elements were retained in the final scale. The assumed one‐factor solution of the refined seven‐item scale was acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.077, Comparative Fit Index = 0.96, Tucker‐Lewis Index = 0.95) and the internal reliability of the two samples were 0.84 and 0.80, respectively. The scores of the BWAS converged with scores on other workaholism scales, except for a Work Enjoyment subscale. A suggested cut‐off for categorization of workaholics showed good discriminative ability in terms of working hours, leadership position, and subjective health complaints. It is concluded that the BWAS has good psychometric properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Gerstein D., 1999, Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission
  2. Mackenzie A., 1997, The time trap
  3. Mosier S. K.(1983).Workaholics: An analysis of their stress success and priorities. Unpublished Master’s thesis University of Texas at Austin.
  4. 10.4337/9781847202833.00013 · doi:10.4337/9781847202833.00013
  5. Nunnally J., 1978, Psychometric theory
  6. 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.70 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Robinson B. E., 1989, Workaholism: Hidden legacies of adult children
  8. 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3c.1226 · doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3c.1226
  9. WHO (World Health Organization), 1992, The ICD‐10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Clinical and descriptions and diagnostic guidelines

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
ANDREASSEN, C. S., GRIFFITHS, M. D., HETLAND, J., & PALLESEN, S.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
265-272
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W1920700175
Cited by
377
References
37
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a work addiction scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x
The paper
ANDREASSEN, C. S., GRIFFITHS, M. D., HETLAND, J., & PALLESEN, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.