Cited by 149Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence

Rowley, Stephanie J., Kurtz‐Costes, Beth, Mistry, Rashmita, Feagans, Laura·2007·Social Development

Abstract

We examined race and gender stereotypes in fourth‐, sixth‐ and eighth‐grade White and Black children. The participants reported their perceptions of the competence of Black, White, female and male children in academic domains, sports and music. In general, low‐status groups (girls and Black children) did not endorse stereotypes that reflected negatively on their own group but were likely to report stereotypes that favored their social group. High‐status groups (boys and Whites) endorsed most traditional stereotypes, whether negative or positive, for their social group. Where age differences appeared, older children were more likely than younger children to report traditional stereotypes and status effects were more pronounced. The results are discussed in terms of group enhancement and relationships between social stereotypes and self‐views.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00376.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From a young age, individuals categorize math and science as 'boys' subjects' and language arts and spelling as 'girls' subjects'.

    “The limited research available on children ' s and adolescents ' academic gender stereotypes suggests that from a young age, individuals categorize math and science as ' boys ' subjects ' and language arts and spelling as ' girls ' subjects ' (e.g., Plante et al., 2009; Rowley et al., 2007).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Rowley et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowley, S. J., Kurtz‐Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Rowley, Stephanie J.
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-29
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
150-168
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W1975453353
Cited by
149
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
racial stereotypes, gender stereotypes, social status, status effects, self-concept, Black children, white children, late childhood, early adolescence, age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review