Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence
Abstract
We examined race and gender stereotypes in fourth‐, sixth‐ and eighth‐grade White and Black children. The participants reported their perceptions of the competence of Black, White, female and male children in academic domains, sports and music. In general, low‐status groups (girls and Black children) did not endorse stereotypes that reflected negatively on their own group but were likely to report stereotypes that favored their social group. High‐status groups (boys and Whites) endorsed most traditional stereotypes, whether negative or positive, for their social group. Where age differences appeared, older children were more likely than younger children to report traditional stereotypes and status effects were more pronounced. The results are discussed in terms of group enhancement and relationships between social stereotypes and self‐views.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
From a young age, individuals categorize math and science as 'boys' subjects' and language arts and spelling as 'girls' subjects'.
“The limited research available on children ' s and adolescents ' academic gender stereotypes suggests that from a young age, individuals categorize math and science as ' boys ' subjects ' and language arts and spelling as ' girls ' subjects ' (e.g., Plante et al., 2009; Rowley et al., 2007).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Rowley et al., 2007
Cites
Beal, F. M. (2008) · Meridians · doi:10.2979/mer.2008.8.2.166 · Cited by 511 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On the other hand, some theorists suggest that Black girls suffer from double jeopardy (Beale, 1970) from being at once girls and Black.”
BackgroundExploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents
Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.606 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bernard, D., & Neblett, E. (2018) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-017-0073-0 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Pahlke, E., & Goble, P. (2015) · International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92151-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rowley, S. J., Kurtz‐Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rowley, Stephanie J.
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-29
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-168
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W1975453353
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- racial stereotypes, gender stereotypes, social status, status effects, self-concept, Black children, white children, late childhood, early adolescence, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review