Cited by 26Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and Coping

A Culturally Informed Model of the Development of the Impostor Phenomenon Among African American Youth

Open access
Bernard, Donte, Neblett, Enrique·2018·Adolescent Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40894-017-0073-0

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, D., & Neblett, E.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Bernard, Donte
Venue
Adolescent Research Review
Published
2017-10-20
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
279-300
ISSN
  • 2363-8346 (ISSN-L)
  • 2363-8354
OpenAlex
W2766067253
Cited by
26
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adolescent Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
impostor syndrome, African American youth, adolescent development, emerging adults, high-achieving students, maladaptive cognitions, developmental pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review