Cited by 530Disaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Community‐based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity‐building in the Philippines

Allen, Katrina M.·2006·Disasters

Abstract

Community‐based disaster preparedness (CBDP) approaches are increasingly important elements of vulnerability reduction and disaster management strategies. They are associated with a policy trend that values the knowledge and capacities of local people and builds on local resources, including social capital. CBDP may be instrumental not only in formulating local coping and adaptation strategies, but also in situating them within wider development planning and debates. In theory, local people can be mobilised to resist unsustainable (vulnerability increasing) forms of development or livelihood practices and to raise local concerns more effectively with political representatives. This paper focuses on the potential of CBDP initiatives to alleviate vulnerability in the context of climate change, and their limitations. It presents evidence from the Philippines that, in the limited forms in which they are currently employed, CBDP initiatives have the potential both to empower and disempower, and warns against treating CBDP as a panacea to disaster management problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00308.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities, and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks.

    “In fact, studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities (Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017), and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks (Allen 2006; Maskrey 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, K. M.
Corresponding author
Allen, Katrina M.
Venue
Disasters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
81-101
ISSN
  • 0361-3666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7717
OpenAlex
W2109784182
Cited by
530
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
FWCI
33.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disasters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
community disaster preparedness, climate change adaptation, local capacity building, vulnerability reduction, disaster management, social capital, empowerment, disempowerment, Philippines
MeSH terms
Disaster Planning, Philippines, Greenhouse Effect, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review