Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models

Snijders, Tom A. B., Pattison, Philippa E., Robins, Garry L., Handcock, Mark S.·2006·Sociological Methodology

Abstract

The most promising class of statistical models for expressing structural properties of social networks observed at one moment in time is the class of exponential random graph models (ERGMs), also known as p* models. The strong point of these models is that they can represent a variety of structural tendencies, such as transitivity, that define complicated dependence patterns not easily modeled by more basic probability models. Recently, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms have been developed that produce approximate maximum likelihood estimators. Applying these models in their traditional specification to observed network data often has led to problems, however, which can be traced back to the fact that important parts of the parameter space correspond to nearly degenerate distributions, which may lead to convergence problems of estimation algorithms, and a poor fit to empirical data. This paper proposes new specifications of exponential random graph models. These specifications represent structural properties such as transitivity and heterogeneity of degrees by more complicated graph statistics than the traditional star and triangle counts. Three kinds of statistics are proposed: geometrically weighted degree distributions, alternating k-triangles, and alternating independent two-paths. Examples are presented both of modeling graphs and digraphs, in which the new specifications lead to much better results than the earlier existing specifications of the ERGM. It is concluded that the new specifications increase the range and applicability of the ERGM as a tool for the statistical analysis of social networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00176.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Boer Peter, 2003, StOCNET: An Open Software System for the Advanced Statistical Analysis of Social Networks. Version 1.4.
  4. Burda Zdzislaw, 2004, Physical Review, 69
  5. 10.2307/2093295 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Davis James A., 1972, Sociological Theories in Progress, 2, 218
  7. 10.1214/aos/1176343282 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1991.tb01310.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478342 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Geman Stuart, 1983, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721
  11. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01443.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1017/S0021900200017897 · doi:10.1017/s0021900200017897
  13. Handcock Mark S., 2002, Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, 229
  14. Handcock Mark S., 2003, “Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks.”
  15. 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.09.006 · DOI
  16. Handcock Mark S., 2005, statnet: An R package for the Statistical Analysis and Simulation of Social Networks.
  17. Hoff Peter D., 2003, “Bilinear Mixed Effects Models for Dyadic Data.”
  18. 10.1198/016214502388618906 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Holland Paul W., 1975, Sociololgical Methodology, 6, 1
  20. Hunter David R., Journal of Graphical and Computational Statistics
  21. 10.1017/S0021900200017629 · doi:10.1017/s0021900200017629
  22. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242726.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2769-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1137/S003614450342480 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/oso/9780198517962.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Park Juyong, 2004, Condensed Matter Abstracts
  29. Pattison Philippa E., 2002, Sociological Methodology, 22, 301
  30. 10.1348/000711099159053 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/BF02294302 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511811395.010 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/427322 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.00134.x · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF02294482 · DOI
  36. Snijders Tom A. B., 2002, Journal of Social Structure
  37. Snijders Tom A. B., 2005, Manual for SIENA version 2.1.
  38. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00204.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Snijders Tom A. B., 2002, Contributions to Social Network Analysis, Information Theory, and Other Topics in Statistics; A Festschrift in honour of Ove Frank, 117
  40. 10.1137/1028156 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Tantrum Jeremy, 2005, “Model Based Clustering for Social Networks.”
  42. 10.1214/aos/1176325750 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/BF02294547 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1017/CBO9780511811395.008 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,445

Metadata

Authors
Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S.
Venue
Sociological Methodology
Published
2006-08
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
99-153
ISSN
  • 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9531
OpenAlex
W2136676173
Cited by
1,445
References
1
FWCI
24.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00176.x
The paper
Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00176.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.