Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding

Ou, Mingdong, Cui, Peng, Pei, Jian, Zhang, Ziwei, Zhu, Wenwu·2016·Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

Graph embedding algorithms embed a graph into a vector space where the structure and the inherent properties of the graph are preserved. The existing graph embedding methods cannot preserve the asymmetric transitivity well, which is a critical property of directed graphs. Asymmetric transitivity depicts the correlation among directed edges, that is, if there is a directed path from u to v, then there is likely a directed edge from u to v. Asymmetric transitivity can help in capturing structures of graphs and recovering from partially observed graphs. To tackle this challenge, we propose the idea of preserving asymmetric transitivity by approximating high-order proximity which are based on asymmetric transitivity. In particular, we develop a novel graph embedding algorithm, High-Order Proximity preserved Embedding (HOPE for short), which is scalable to preserve high-order proximities of large scale graphs and capable of capturing the asymmetric transitivity. More specifically, we first derive a general formulation that cover multiple popular high-order proximity measurements, then propose a scalable embedding algorithm to approximate the high-order proximity measurements based on their general formulation. Moreover, we provide a theoretical upper bound on the RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) of the approximation. Our empirical experiments on a synthetic dataset and three real-world datasets demonstrate that HOPE can approximate the high-order proximities significantly better than the state-of-art algorithms and outperform the state-of-art algorithms in tasks of reconstruction, link prediction and vertex recommendation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2939672.2939751

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Belkin M., 2001, NIPS, 14, 585
  2. 10.1109/ICDM.2014.115 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2014.115
  3. Chen M., 2007, IJCAI, 2707
  4. Jolliffe I., 2002, Wiley Online Library
  5. Levy O., 2014, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2177
  6. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.12.019 · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.12.019
  7. Perrault-Joncas D., 2014, Estimating vector fields on manifolds and the embedding of directed graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.0013 · arXiv
  8. Perrault-Joncas D. C., 2011, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 990
  9. Scholkopft B., 1999, Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels. Neural networks for signal processing IX, 1:1
  10. 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.12 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,248

Metadata

Authors
Ou, M., Cui, P., Pei, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, W.
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-08-13
Pages
1105-1114
OpenAlex
W2387462954
Cited by
1,248
References
33
FWCI
54.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Program on Key Basic Research Project (2015CB352300)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61370022, No. 61531006, No. 61472444 and No. 61210008)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2939672.2939751
The paper
Ou, M., Cui, P., Pei, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, W. (2016). Asymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939751

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.