Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge*

Navaro‐Yashin, Yael·2009·Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

This article critically engages with recent theoretical writings on affect and non‐human agency by way of studying the emotive energies discharged by properties and objects appropriated during war from members of the so‐called ‘enemy’ community. The ethnographic material comes from long‐term fieldwork in Northern Cyprus, focusing on how it feels to live with the objects and within the ruins left behind by the other, now displaced, community. I study Turkish‐Cypriots’ relations to houses, land, and objects that they appropriated from the Greek‐Cypriots during the war of 1974 and the subsequent partition of Cyprus. My ethnographic material leads me to reflect critically on the object‐centred philosophy of Actor Network Theory and on the affective turn in the human sciences after the work of Gilles Deleuze. With the metaphor of ‘ruination’, I study what goes amiss in scholarly declarations of theoretical turns or shifts. Instead, proposing an anthropologically engaged theory of affect through an ethnographic reflection on spatial and material melancholia, I argue that ethnography, in its most productive moments, is trans‐paradigmatic. Retaining what has been ruined as still needful of consideration, I suggest an approach which merges theories of affect and subjectivity as well as of language and materiality. Résumé: L'article examine sous un angle critique les écrits théoriques récents sur l'affect et l' agency non humaine pour étudier les énergies émotives libérées par les biens et objets confisqués lors d'un conflit armé aux membres de la communauté dite «ennemie». Le matériel ethnographique provient d'un travail de terrain de longue durée dans le Nord de Chypre, qui portait sur le ressenti de ceux qui vivent avec ces objets, dans les ruines laissées par l'autre communauté désormais déplacée. L'auteure étudie les relations des Chypriotes turcs avec les maisons, les terres et les objets qu'ils se sont appropriés sur les Chypriotes grecs lors de la guerre de 1974 et de la partition de Chypre. Le matériel ethnographique la conduit à une réflexion critique sur la philosophie centrée sur les objets de la théorie de l'acteur‐réseau et sur le tournant affectif des sciences humaines à la suite des travaux de Gilles Deleuze. Par la métaphore de la «ruine», l'auteur sonde ce qui ne va pas dans les proclamations académiques de tournants théoriques et de changements paradigmatiques. En lieu et place, elle propose une théorie de l'affect engagée dans l'anthropologie, par une réflexion ethnographique sur la mélancolie spatiale et matérielle, et affirme que l'ethnographie, dans ses moments les plus productifs, est trans‐paradigmatique. En gardant ce qui est «ruiné» comme digne encore de considération, l'auteure suggère une approche qui concilie les théories de l'affect et de la subjectivité et du langage et de la matérialité.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.01527.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Agamben G., 2005, State of exception
  2. Benjamin A., 1994, Destruction and experience: Walter Benjamin's philosophy, x
  3. Benjamin W., 1970, Illuminations, 245
  4. Benjamin W., 1998, One‐way street, 132
  5. Borch‐Jacobsen M., 1992, The emotional tie: psychoanalysis, mimesis, and affect
  6. Butler J., 1997, The psychic life of power: theories in subjection, 10.1515/9781503616295 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Clough P.T., 2007, The affective turn: theorizing the social, 10.1215/9780822389606 · DOI
  8. Connolly W.E., 1999, Brain waves, transcendental fields and techniques of thought, Radical Philosophy, 94, 19
  9. Connolly W.E., 2006, Powers of the secular modern: Talal Asad and his interlocutors, 75, 10.1515/9780804767798-005 · DOI
  10. Deleuze G., 2004, A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia
  11. Dirks N., 1998, In near ruins: cultural theory at the end of the century, 1
  12. Douglas M., 1966, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
  13. Freud S., 2001, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 243
  14. Grosz E., 1989, Sexual subversions: three French feminists
  15. Guattari F., 1996, The Guattari reader/Pierre Félix Guattari, 158
  16. Henare A., 2007, Thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically, 10.4324/9780203088791 · DOI
  17. Kristeva J., 1982, Powers of horror: an essay on abjection
  18. Kuhn T.S., 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions
  19. Kuper A., 1973, Anthropologists and anthropology: the British School, 1922‐1972
  20. Latour B., 1993, We have never been modern
  21. Latour B., 1999, Actor Network Theory and after, 15
  22. Latour B., 2005, Making things public: atmospheres in democracy, 14
  23. Latour B., 2005, Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory, 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Loizos P., 1975, Greek gift: politics in a Cypriot village
  25. Loizos P., 1981, The heart grown bitter: a chronicle of Cypriot war refugees
  26. Malinowski B., 1927, Sex and repression in savage society
  27. Massumi B., 2002, Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation
  28. Navaro‐Yashin Y., 2003, Life is dead here’: sensing the political in ‘no man's land, Anthropological Theory, 3, 107, 10.1177/1463499603003001174 · DOI
  29. Navaro‐Yashin Y., 2005, Sovereign bodies: citizens, migrants and states in the postcolonial world, 103
  30. Navaro‐Yashin Y., 2007, Make‐believe papers, legal forms, and the counterfeit: affective interactions between documents and people in Britain and Cyprus, Anthropological Theory, 7, 79, 10.1177/1463499607074294 · DOI
  31. Spinoza B., 1996, Ethics
  32. Stocking G., 1986, Malinowski, Rivers, Benedict and others: essays on culture and personality
  33. Strathern M., 1987, An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology, Signs, 12, 276, 10.1086/494321 · DOI
  34. Strathern M., 1996, Cutting the network, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, 517, 10.2307/3034901 · DOI
  35. Strathern M., 2000, Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy
  36. Thrift N., 2000, Afterwords, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 213, 10.1068/d214t · DOI
  37. Thrift N., 2004, Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect, Geografiska Annaler, 86, 57, 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x · DOI
  38. Thrift N., 2008, Non‐representational theory: space/politics/affect, 10.4324/9780203946565 · DOI
  39. ŽIžek S., 2004, Organs without bodies: on Deleuze and consequences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Navaro‐Yashin, Y.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-05
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1359-0987
  • 1467-9655
Cited by
494
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review