Cited by 73Cinema and Media StudiesParticipatory Visual Research MethodsCinema History and Criticism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking observational cinema

Grimshaw, Anna, Ravetz, Amanda·2009·Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

‘Observational cinema’ has long been central to debates in visual anthropology. Although initially hailed as a radical breakthrough in ethnographic filmmaking, the genre was subsequently criticized as naïvely empiricist and lacking in reflexive sophistication. In this article, we make a new case for observational cinema. It grows out of a renewed attention to practice. We argue that observational work be understood not as preliminary to anthropological proper but as a distinctive form of anthropology in its own right. Résumé: Le « cinéma d'observation » est depuis longtemps un sujet de controverse dans l'anthropologie visuelle. Saluéà ses débuts comme une révolution dans l'acquisition d'images ethnographiques, le genre a été critiqué par la suite comme entaché d'un empirisme naïf et dépourvu d'élaboration réflexive. Les auteures plaident ici pour le cinéma d'observation, à partir d'une attention renouvelée pour cette pratique. Elles demandent que le travail d'observation soit considéré non pas comme un préliminaire au travail anthropologique proprement dit, mais comme une forme distincte d'anthropologie à part entière.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01573.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.4135/9780857020284 · DOI
  2. Bazin A., 1967, What is cinema?
  3. Bazin A., 1972, What is cinema?
  4. Bruzzi S., 2000, New documentary: a critical introduction
  5. Dineen M., 2003, The documentary makers: interviews with 15 of the best in the business, 22
  6. Fabian J., 1983, Time and the other: how anthropology makes its other
  7. Grasseni C., 2004, Working images: methods and media in ethnographic research, 15
  8. 10.3167/9781845452100 · DOI
  9. Grimshaw A., 2009, Observational cinema: anthropology, film and the exploration of social life, 10.2979/5899.0 · DOI
  10. Henley P., 2004, Working images: methods and media in ethnographic research, 109
  11. Herzfeld M., 2004, The body impolitic: artisans and artifice in the global hierarchy of value
  12. Herzfeld M., 2007, Ways of knowing: new approaches in the anthropology of knowledge and learning, 91
  13. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2979/5260.0 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lawrence D.H., 1950, Selected essays, 307
  16. Loizos P., 1997, Rethinking visual anthropology, 81
  17. MacDougall D., 1995, Principles of visual anthropology, 115, 10.1515/9783110290691.115 · DOI
  18. MacDougall D., 1998, Transcultural cinema
  19. MacDougall D., 2006, The corporeal image: film, ethnography and the senses
  20. Nichols B., 1991, Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary
  21. 10.1080/0014184020042643 · DOI
  22. Ravetz A.2001.Vision knowledge and the invention of place in an English town. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis University of Manchester.
  23. Ruby J., 2000, Picturing culture: explorations of film and anthropology
  24. Sandall R., 1972, Observation and identity, Sight and Sound, 41, 192
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00484.x · DOI
  26. Stewart S., 2005, The open studio: essays on art and aesthetics
  27. 10.9783/9780812203134 · DOI
  28. Taussig M., 1993, Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses
  29. 10.1515/9783110290691.99 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A.
Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Grimshaw, Anna
  • Ravetz, Amanda
Venue
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-11
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
538-556
ISSN
  • 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9655
OpenAlex
W2046957723
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
Keywords
observational cinema, ethnographic filmmaking, visual anthropology, reflexivity, empiricism, ethnographic observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking observational cinema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01573.x
The paper
Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2009). Rethinking observational cinema. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01573.x