The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BUDDHISM AND SCIENCE: HOW FAR CAN THE DIALOGUE PROCEED?
Open accessAbstract
On the stage of the religion‐and‐science dialogue, Buddhism, especially Tibetan Buddhism, is a late arrival. However, thanks primarily to the long‐standing personal interest of the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan tradition he represents has come to engage deeply with various disciplines of modern science. This essay follows the active engagement that has occurred particularly in the form of the biannual Mind and Life dialogues between the Dalai Lama and scientists. From the perspective of an active participant, I present the careful deliberations that ensure constructive parameters for these dialogues so that no one side can exert a hegemonic voice. I explore the challenges that are likely to confront the Buddhist side from its encounter with science, particularly with respect to its worldview. I identify specific areas where the two sides can and do engage in concrete collaboration, especially with respect to investigating healthy qualities of the mind and the effects of conscious mental training for attention and emotion regulation. Finally, I explore the question of the possible impact of this dialogue on modern science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most of the high points in [Indian Buddhism ' s] development, whether Nagarjuna ' s philosophy of emptiness in the second century C.E. or Dharmakirti ' s epistemology in the seventh century, took place within the context of critical engagement with other systems of thought.”
From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Jinpa 2010: 878
In the citing paper
“Debate and refinement of views in the wake of criticism have been an integral part of the dynamics of idea development in Buddhist thought. (Jinpa 2010: 878)”
From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Jinpa 2010: 878
Citations
Cites
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- “Buddhism and Science: On the Nature of the Dialogue.”
- “Philosophical Theories of Consciousness: Asian Perspectives.”
- “Science as an Ally or a Rival Philosophy? Tibetan Buddhist Thinkers’ Engagement with Modern Science.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System
Cho, F., & Squier, R. K. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lft016 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Jinpa, T.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jinpa, Thupten
- Venue
- Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
- Publisher
- Open Library of the Humanities
- Published
- 2010-12-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0591-2385 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9744
- OpenAlex
- W2101348020
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 32.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Zygon® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Keywords
- Buddhism and science, Tibetan Buddhism, Dalai Lama, dialogue between science and religion, Buddhist worldview, mental training, attention, emotion regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BUDDHISM AND SCIENCE: HOW FAR CAN THE DIALOGUE PROCEED? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01138.x
- The paper
- Jinpa, T. (2010). BUDDHISM AND SCIENCE: HOW FAR CAN THE DIALOGUE PROCEED? Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01138.x