Cited by 37Study and Philosophy of ReligionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyEvolution and Science Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE OF RELIGION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THEISM?

Open access
Leech, David, Visala, Aku·2011·Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Abstract

Abstract. Although the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR), a current approach to the scientific study of religion, has exerted an influence in the study of religion for almost twenty years, the question of its compatibility or incompatibility with theism has not been the subject of serious discussion until recently. Some critics of religion have taken a lively interest in the CSR because they see it as useful in explaining why religious believers consistently make costly commitments to false beliefs. Conversely, some theists have argued for the compatibility of religious belief with basic CSR results. In this article, we contribute to the incipient discussion about the worldview relevance of the CSR by arguing that while a theistic reading of the field only represents one interpretative option at most, antitheistic claims about the incompatibility of the CSR with theism look like they may be harder to maintain than first appearances might suggest.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01157.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive mechanisms such as HADD, or the compilation HADD + ToM + MCI, hardly make up a causally sufficient explanation for god-belief.

    “Third, cognitive mechanisms such as HADD, or the compilation HADD + ToM + MCI, hardly make up a causally sufficient explanation for god‐belief (Leech and Visala 2011).”

    From DEBUNKING ARGUMENTS GAIN LITTLE FROM COGNITIVE SCIENCE OF RELIGION (2021) · cites this paper as Leech and Visala 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. Theology and Science
  3. Why Do Gods and Spirits Matter at All
  4. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  5. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
  6. Religious Education
  7. Journal of the American Academy of Religion
  8. Harvard Theological Review
  9. What Theology Might Learn (and Not Learn) from Evolutionary Psychology: A Postfoundationalist Theologian in Conversation with Pascal Boyer
  10. Well‐Disposed Social Anthropologist's Problem with the Cognitive Science of Religion
  11. Introduction
  12. Zygon
  13. Religious Studies
  14. Reduction: Models of Cross‐Scientific Relations and Their Implications for the Psychology‐Neuroscience Interface
  15. Four Arguments That the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief
  16. Scientific Explanations of Religion and the Justification of Religion Belief
  17. Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: Explaining and Explaining Away
  18. Religious Studies
  19. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
  20. Zygon
  21. Journal of the American Academy of Religion
  22. Mind
  23. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
  24. Towards an Integration of Ethnography, History, and the Cognitive Science of Religion
  25. Beyond Thick Descriptions and Interpretive Sciences: Explaining Religious Meaning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leech, D., & Visala, A.
Affiliations
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
Corresponding author
  • Leech, David
  • Visala, Aku
Venue
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
Published
2011-03-02
Volume
46
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0591-2385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9744
OpenAlex
W2151423184
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zygon® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
cognitive science of religion, theism, religious beliefs, worldview, science and religion, religious cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review