Cited by 821Study and Philosophy of ReligionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion

McCutcheon, Russell T., Guthrie, Stewart Elliott·1994·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1386639

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCutcheon, R. T., & Guthrie, S. E.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-03
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
81
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979058822
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
theory of religion, religious experience, religious beliefs, philosophy of religion, cognitive science of religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review