L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of vocabulary glossing on recall and vocabulary learning, as well as learners’ preferences as to glossing. Eighty‐five native speakers of English studying Spanish at the university level participated. Participants read a Spanish text under one of three treatment conditions: no gloss, English glosses, or Spanish glosses. They then were asked to write what they recalled of the passage, translate a list of the glossed vocabulary, and complete a questionnaire. The translation task was repeated four weeks later. Results showed that glossing did not significantly affect recall for the participants overall, but that those with higher than average proficiency recalled more if they had read a glossed version of the text. Those who had glosses outperformed their peers on the translation task administered immediately after they had read the text. However, this difference disappeared on the retest. Participants expressed preference for glosses, wished that they be located in the margin, and favoured Spanish glosses if they were comprehensible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of marginal glosses enhances vocabulary retention compared to the absence of marginal glosses.
“However, the presence of marginal glosses was found to enhance vocabulary retention, when compared to the absence of marginal glosses (Hulstijn, 1992;Hulstijn, Hollander & Greidanus, 1996;Jacobs, Dufon, & Fong, 1994;Watanabe, 1997).”
From Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition (2001) · cites this paper as Jacobs, Dufon, & Fong, 1994
Cites
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747758 · Cited by 1,249 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Pulido, D. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00217 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
The Effect of Instructional Conditions on Students’ Vocabulary Retention
Kitajima, R. (2001) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02086.x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Using glossaries to increase the lexical coverage of television programs
Webb, S. (2010) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66653 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F. C.
- Affiliations
- SEAMEO Regional Language Centre (SG)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, George M.
- ORCID
- Jacobs, George M.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Reading
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-28
- ISSN
- 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9817
- OpenAlex
- W2143970134
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- second language reading, Spanish as a foreign language, English glosses, vocabulary acquisition, reading comprehension, memory retrieval, translation, learner preferences, second language vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review