Cited by 247Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge

Jacobs, George M., Dufon, Peggy, Hong, Fong Cheng·1994·Journal of Research in Reading

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of vocabulary glossing on recall and vocabulary learning, as well as learners’ preferences as to glossing. Eighty‐five native speakers of English studying Spanish at the university level participated. Participants read a Spanish text under one of three treatment conditions: no gloss, English glosses, or Spanish glosses. They then were asked to write what they recalled of the passage, translate a list of the glossed vocabulary, and complete a questionnaire. The translation task was repeated four weeks later. Results showed that glossing did not significantly affect recall for the participants overall, but that those with higher than average proficiency recalled more if they had read a glossed version of the text. Those who had glosses outperformed their peers on the translation task administered immediately after they had read the text. However, this difference disappeared on the retest. Participants expressed preference for glosses, wished that they be located in the margin, and favoured Spanish glosses if they were comprehensible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1994.tb00049.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of marginal glosses enhances vocabulary retention compared to the absence of marginal glosses.

    “However, the presence of marginal glosses was found to enhance vocabulary retention, when compared to the absence of marginal glosses (Hulstijn, 1992;Hulstijn, Hollander & Greidanus, 1996;Jacobs, Dufon, & Fong, 1994;Watanabe, 1997).”

    From Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition (2001) · cites this paper as Jacobs, Dufon, & Fong, 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F. C.
Affiliations
  • SEAMEO Regional Language Centre (SG)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, George M.
Venue
Journal of Research in Reading
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9817
OpenAlex
W2143970134
Cited by
247
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
second language reading, Spanish as a foreign language, English glosses, vocabulary acquisition, reading comprehension, memory retrieval, translation, learner preferences, second language vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review