Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: examining where these differences lie
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the relationship between reading ability, frequency of reading and attitudes and beliefs relating to reading and school. Two hundred and thirty‐two 10‐year‐old children (117 male) completed a reading comprehension test and a questionnaire exploring the following areas: frequency of reading, attitude to reading, attitude to school, competency beliefs and perceived academic support (from peers and teacher). Overall, girls had better reading comprehension, read more frequently and had a more positive attitude to reading and school. However, smaller gender differences were found in reading ability than in attitudes and frequency of reading. Indeed, effect sizes for gender differences in reading were found to be small in this and other studies. Reading ability correlated with both boys' and girls' reading frequency and competency beliefs; however, only boys' reading ability was associated with their attitude to reading and school. Notably, gender differences were found predominantly in the relationship between factors, rather than solely in the factors themselves. Previous research has neglected to study these relationships, and has focused instead on the gender differences found in individual factors. Conclusions are made regarding the applicability of these findings to the school situation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Boys have a more negative attitude towards school than girls.
“Prior research has revealed that boys have a more negative attitude towards school than girls (e.g., Harvey 1985; Logan and Johnston 2009).”
From Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Logan and Johnston 2009
Cites
Differently literate: Gender identity and the construction of the developing reader
MILLARD, E. (1997) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540259721439 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.030 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review
Gubbels, J., van der Put, C. E., & Assink, M. (2019) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Extensive Reading Research
Nakanishi, T. (2015) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.157 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2016) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12134 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Merke, S., Ganushchak, L., & van Steensel, R. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100572 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Logan, S., & Johnston, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Hull (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Logan, Sarah
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Reading
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-214
- ISSN
- 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9817
- OpenAlex
- W2095423454
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- gender differences, reading skills, reading comprehension, reading frequency, attitudes toward school, peer support, teacher support, elementary school students, children aged 10
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review