Cited by 404Literacy and Educational PracticesReading and Literacy DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: examining where these differences lie

Open access
Logan, Sarah, Johnston, Rhona·2009·Journal of Research in Reading

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the relationship between reading ability, frequency of reading and attitudes and beliefs relating to reading and school. Two hundred and thirty‐two 10‐year‐old children (117 male) completed a reading comprehension test and a questionnaire exploring the following areas: frequency of reading, attitude to reading, attitude to school, competency beliefs and perceived academic support (from peers and teacher). Overall, girls had better reading comprehension, read more frequently and had a more positive attitude to reading and school. However, smaller gender differences were found in reading ability than in attitudes and frequency of reading. Indeed, effect sizes for gender differences in reading were found to be small in this and other studies. Reading ability correlated with both boys' and girls' reading frequency and competency beliefs; however, only boys' reading ability was associated with their attitude to reading and school. Notably, gender differences were found predominantly in the relationship between factors, rather than solely in the factors themselves. Previous research has neglected to study these relationships, and has focused instead on the gender differences found in individual factors. Conclusions are made regarding the applicability of these findings to the school situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boys have a more negative attitude towards school than girls.

    “Prior research has revealed that boys have a more negative attitude towards school than girls (e.g., Harvey 1985; Logan and Johnston 2009).”

    From Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Logan and Johnston 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logan, S., & Johnston, R.
Affiliations
University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Logan, Sarah
Venue
Journal of Research in Reading
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-14
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
199-214
ISSN
  • 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9817
OpenAlex
W2095423454
Cited by
404
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
55.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
gender differences, reading skills, reading comprehension, reading frequency, attitudes toward school, peer support, teacher support, elementary school students, children aged 10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review