The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ideologised values for British accents1
Open accessAbstract
We report quantitative results from a large online survey of 5010 U.K. informants' reactions to 34 different accents of English, based on simple accent labels. Patterns of accent evaluation, in terms of adjudged levels of prestige, social attractiveness and some other variables, in many regards confirm broad findings from earlier research. Accent‐types associated with ‘standard’ speech are, for example, strongly favoured in the prestige and attractiveness dimensions. Several urban U.K. vernaculars, but not all, are systematically downgraded. On the other hand, robust differences emerge which have not been strongly evidenced previously – particularly differences according to informant gender (with females regularly producing more favourable evaluations) and region (with informants often favouring their own and linked varieties). There are also some important effects by informant age, for example with younger informants attributing less prestige to ‘standard’ accents. We interpret the findings as indicating rather persistent U.K. language‐ideologies around accent difference that are being reconstituted only gradually and in specific regards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Romaine, S. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198731924.003.0003 · Cited by 2,685
English with an Accent: Language Ideology and Discrimination in the United States
Wolfram, W., & Lippi-Green, R. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417270 · Cited by 1,534
Style: Language Variation and Identity
Coupland, N. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755064 · Cited by 1,310
Self-citationLanguage ideologies and the consequences of standardization
Milroy, J. (2001) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00163 · Cited by 1,234
Speech style and social evaluation
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,192
Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory
(1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195105612.001.0001 · Cited by 882
EVALUATIVE REACTIONS TO ACCENTS
Giles, H. (1970) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/0013191700220301 · Cited by 566
Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance
Garrett, P., Williams, A., & Coupland, N. (2003) · Cited by 530
Self-citationSociolinguistics : an international handbook of the science of language and society
Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Mattheier, K. J. (1987) · Cited by 508
'Talking Proper': the rise of accent as social symbol
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-0746 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Voice as a Design Material: Sociophonetic Inspired Design Strategies in Human-Computer Interaction
Sutton, S. J., Foulkes, P., Kirk, D., & Lawson, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300833 · Cited by 92
American or British? L2 speakers’ recognition and evaluations of accent features in English
Carrie, E., & McKenzie, R. M. (2018) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2017.1389946 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Coupland, N., & Bishop, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Sociolinguistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-93
- ISSN
- 1360-6441 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9841
- OpenAlex
- W2159230281
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 47.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideologised values for British accents1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.x
- The paper
- Coupland, N., & Bishop, H. (2007). Ideologised values for British accents1. Journal of Sociolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.