Cited by 92Speech and dialogue systemsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface Design

Voice as a Design Material: Sociophonetic Inspired Design Strategies in Human-Computer Interaction

Open access
Sutton, Selina Jeanne, Foulkes, Paul, Kirk, David, Lawson, Shaun·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

While there is a renewed interest in voice user interfaces (VUI) in HCI, little attention has been paid to the design of VUI voice output beyond intelligibility and naturalness. We draw on the field of sociophonetics - the study of the social factors that influence the production and perception of speech - to highlight how current VUIs are based on a limited and homogenised set of voice outputs. We argue that current systems do not adequately consider the diversity of peoples' speech, how that diversity represents sociocultural identities, and how voices have the potential to shape user perceptions and experiences. Ultimately, as other technological developments have influenced the ideologies of language, the voice outputs of VUIs will influence the ideologies of speech. Based on our argument, we pose three design strategies for VUI voice output design - individualisation, context awareness, and diversification - to motivate new ways of conceptualising and designing these technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300833

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Hadumod Bussmann. 1998. 'speech'. In Routledge Dictionary of Lan- guage and Linguistics. Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1106.
  2. Paul Foulkes, James M. Scobbie, and Dominic J. L. Watt. 2010. So- ciophonetics. In Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (2nd ed.), William J. Hardcastle, John Laver, and Fiona E. Gibbon (Eds.). Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 703ś754.
  3. Arthur Hughes, Peter Trudgill, and Dominic J. L. Watt. 2013. English accents & dialects : an introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles (5th ed.).
  4. James Milroy and Lesley Milroy. 1978. Belfast: change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, Peter Trudgill (Ed.). University Park Press, USA, 19ś36.
  5. Roger K. Moore. 2017. Appropriate Voices for Artefacts: Some Key Insights. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Vocal Interactivity in-and-between Humans, Animals and Robots (VIHAR) Skvöde, Sweden, 25-26 Aug 2017. 7ś11. http://vihar-2017.vihar.org/ assets/vihar2017_proceedings.pdf
  6. Cathy Pearl. 2016. Designing Voice User Interfaces : Principles of Con- versational Experiences. O'Reilly Media, Boston, USA.
  7. James Pfrehm. 2018. Technolingualism : the mind and the machine. Bloomsbury, Cambridge, Massachusetts. https://www.bloomsbury. com/uk/technolingualism-9781472578365/
  8. Marie Louise Juul Sùndergaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2018. In- timate Futures. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 -DIS '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 869ś880. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196766 · DOI
  9. James Tompkinson. 2015. Accent evaluation and the perception of spoken threats. In Proceedings of the third Postgraduate and Academic Researchers in Linguistics at York conference (PARLAY 2015). University of York, UK, 115ś131. https://yorkpapersinlinguistics.files.wordpress. com/2016/06/james-tompkinson-parlay-proceedings-2015.pdf
  10. Jessica Wormald. 2016. Regional Variation in Punjabi-English. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universty of York, York, UK. http://etheses.whiterose.ac. uk/13188/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutton, S. J., Foulkes, P., Kirk, D., & Lawson, S.
Affiliations
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W2931579440
Cited by
92
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
voice user interface, sociophonetics, sociocultural identity, voice design, individualization, context awareness, user perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review