The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic Forecasts of Wind Speed: Ensemble Model Output Statistics by using Heteroscedastic Censored Regression
Abstract
Summary: As wind energy penetration continues to grow, there is a critical need for probabilistic forecasts of wind resources. In addition, there are many other societally relevant uses for forecasts of wind speed, ranging from aviation to ship routing and recreational boating. Over the past two decades, ensembles of dynamical weather prediction models have been developed, in which multiple estimates of the current state of the atmosphere are used to generate a collection of deterministic forecasts. However, even state of the art ensemble systems are uncalibrated and biased. Here we propose a novel way of statistically post-processing dynamical ensembles for wind speed by using heteroscedastic censored (tobit) regression, where location and spread derive from the ensemble. The resulting ensemble model output statistics method is applied to 48-h-ahead forecasts of maximum wind speed over the North American Pacific Northwest by using the University of Washington mesoscale ensemble. The statistically post-processed density forecasts turn out to be calibrated and sharp, and result in a substantial improvement over the unprocessed ensemble or climatological reference forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Self-citationDawid, A. P. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981683 · Cited by 1,085 · cited 1×
“The PIT is the value that the predictive cumulative distribution function attains at the observation and is a continuous analogue of the verification rank (Dawid, 1984; Diebold et al., 1998; Gneiting et al., 2007).”
BackgroundGood, I. J. (1952) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1952.tb00104.x · Cited by 976
Spatial Analysis to Quantify Numerical Model Bias and Dependence: How Many Climate Models Are There?
Jun, M., Knutti, R., & Nychka, D. W. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214507000001265 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Spatial Analysis to Quantify Numerical Model Bias and Dependence: How Many Climate Models Are There?
Jun, M., Knutti, R., & Nychka, D. W. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214507000001265 · Cited by 214
Quality control and bias adjustment of crowdsourced wind speed observations
Chen, J., Saunders, K., & Whan, K. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.4146 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorarinsdottir, T. L., & Gneiting, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-09
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-388
- ISSN
- 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-985X
- OpenAlex
- W2165396194
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic Forecasts of Wind Speed: Ensemble Model Output Statistics by using Heteroscedastic Censored Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2009.00616.x
- The paper
- Thorarinsdottir, T. L., & Gneiting, T. (2010). Probabilistic Forecasts of Wind Speed: Ensemble Model Output Statistics by using Heteroscedastic Censored Regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2009.00616.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.