Cited by 976Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsProbability and Statistical ResearchGame Theory and Applications

Rational Decisions

Good, I. J.·1952·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary This paper deals first with the relationship between the theory of probability and the theory of rational behaviour. A method is then suggested for encouraging people to make accurate probability estimates, a connection with the theory of imformation being mentioned. Finally Wald’s theory of statistical decision functions is summarised and generalised and its relation to the theory of rational behaviour is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1952.tb00104.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Good, I. J.
Corresponding author
Good, I. J.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1952-01-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
107-114
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W4239966440
Cited by
976
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 41
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
probability theory, rational action, information theory, statistical decision theory, decision making under uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review