The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian Predictive Process Models for Large Spatial Data Sets
Open accessAbstract
Summary: With scientific data available at geocoded locations, investigators are increasingly turning to spatial process models for carrying out statistical inference. Over the last decade, hierarchical models implemented through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods have become especially popular for spatial modelling, given their flexibility and power to fit models that would be infeasible with classical methods as well as their avoidance of possibly inappropriate asymptotics. However, fitting hierarchical spatial models often involves expensive matrix decompositions whose computational complexity increases in cubic order with the number of spatial locations, rendering such models infeasible for large spatial data sets. This computational burden is exacerbated in multivariate settings with several spatially dependent response variables. It is also aggravated when data are collected at frequent time points and spatiotemporal process models are used. With regard to this challenge, our contribution is to work with what we call predictive process models for spatial and spatiotemporal data. Every spatial (or spatiotemporal) process induces a predictive process model (in fact, arbitrarily many of them). The latter models project process realizations of the former to a lower dimensional subspace, thereby reducing the computational burden. Hence, we achieve the flexibility to accommodate non-stationary, non-Gaussian, possibly multivariate, possibly spatiotemporal processes in the context of large data sets. We discuss attractive theoretical properties of these predictive processes. We also provide a computational template encompassing these diverse settings. Finally, we illustrate the approach with simulated and real data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources
Stevens, D. L., & Olsen, A. R. (2004) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214504000000250 · Cited by 1,294
Cited by
Rue, H., Martino, S., & Chopin, N. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x · Cited by 5,279
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindström, J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x · Cited by 2,708
Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA
Lindgren, F., & Rue, H. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v063.i19 · Cited by 1,188
Bobb, J. F., Claus Henn, B., Valeri, L., & Coull, B. A. (2018) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0413-y · Cited by 1,083
Meta-analysis of proportions using generalized linear mixed models.
Lin, L., & Chu, H. (2020) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001232 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Banerjee, S., Gelfand, A. E., Finley, A. O., & Sang, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 825-848
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2004807582
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 69.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian Predictive Process Models for Large Spatial Data Sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00663.x
- The paper
- Banerjee, S., Gelfand, A. E., Finley, A. O., & Sang, H. (2008). Gaussian Predictive Process Models for Large Spatial Data Sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00663.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.