Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources
Abstract
The spatial distribution of a natural resource is an important consideration in designing an efficient survey or monitoring program for the resource. Generally, sample sites that are spatially balanced, that is, more or less evenly dispersed over the extent of the resource, are more efficient than simple random sampling. We review a unified strategy for selecting spatially balanced probability samples of natural resources. The technique is based on creating a function that maps two-dimensional space into one-dimensional space, thereby defining an ordered spatial address. We use a restricted randomization to randomly order the addresses, so that systematic sampling along the randomly ordered linear structure results in a spatially well-balanced random sample. Variable inclusion probability, proportional to an arbitrary positive ancillary variable, is easily accommodated. The basic technique selects points in a two-dimensional continuum, but is also applicable to sampling finite populations or one-dimensional continua embedded in two-dimensional space. An extension of the basic technique gives a way to order the sample points so that any set of consecutively numbered points is in itself a spatially well-balanced sample. This latter property is extremely useful in adjusting the sample for the frame imperfections common in environmental sampling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In each of the 39 parks, plot-monitoring locations were established using Generalized Random Tessellation Stratification (GRTS) to generate a spatially balanced, randomized sample across the parks' forests.
“In each of the 39 parks, plot-monitoring locations were established using Generalized Random Tessellation Stratification (GRTS) to generate a spatially balanced, randomized sample across the parks' forests (Stevens & Olsen, 2004).”
From Overabundant deer and invasive plants drive widespread regeneration debt in eastern United States national parks (2023) · cites this paper as Stevens & Olsen, 2004
Because of the algorithm used to determine plot locations, the plots sampled at COLO in cycle 1 were an unbiased, random sample.
“However, because of the algorithm (Stevens & Olsen, 2004) used to determine plot locations, the plots sampled at COLO in cycle 1 were an unbiased, random sample, even though the estimates are likely to be less precise than if a full cycle had been completed.”
From Overabundant deer and invasive plants drive widespread regeneration debt in eastern United States national parks (2023) · cites this paper as Stevens & Olsen, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using GIS to Generate Spatially Balanced Random Survey Designs for Natural Resource Applications
Theobald, D. M., Stevens, D. L., White, D., Urquhart, N. S., Olsen, A. R., & Norman, J. B. (2007) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0199-x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationBouchet, P. J., & Meeuwig, J. J. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es14-00380.1 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Miller, K. M., Perles, S. J., Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., Weed, A. S., Comiskey, J. A., Marshall, M. R., Nelson, P., & Fisichelli, N. A. (2023) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2837 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Agne, M. C., Woolley, T., & Fitzgerald, S. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Miller, K. M., Dieffenbach, F. W., Campbell, J. P., Cass, W. B., Comiskey, J. A., Matthews, E. R., McGill, B. J., Mitchell, B. R., Perles, S. J., Sanders, S., et al. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1404 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., & Brolis, A. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118015 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Using a bird community index to evaluate national parks in the urbanized national capital region
Goodwin, S. E., & Shriver, W. G. (2014) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0363-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stevens, D. L., & Olsen, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- ORCID
- Olsen, Anthony R
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 465
- Pages
- 262-278
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2080439372
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
- Keywords
- spatially balanced sampling, natural resources, systematic sampling, restricted randomization, auxiliary variables, finite population sampling, one-dimensional continua, environmental monitoring, survey design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review