Cited by 1,294Survey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesOptimal Experimental Design MethodsPoint processes and geometric inequalities

Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources

Stevens, Don L, Olsen, Anthony R·2004·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The spatial distribution of a natural resource is an important consideration in designing an efficient survey or monitoring program for the resource. Generally, sample sites that are spatially balanced, that is, more or less evenly dispersed over the extent of the resource, are more efficient than simple random sampling. We review a unified strategy for selecting spatially balanced probability samples of natural resources. The technique is based on creating a function that maps two-dimensional space into one-dimensional space, thereby defining an ordered spatial address. We use a restricted randomization to randomly order the addresses, so that systematic sampling along the randomly ordered linear structure results in a spatially well-balanced random sample. Variable inclusion probability, proportional to an arbitrary positive ancillary variable, is easily accommodated. The basic technique selects points in a two-dimensional continuum, but is also applicable to sampling finite populations or one-dimensional continua embedded in two-dimensional space. An extension of the basic technique gives a way to order the sample points so that any set of consecutively numbered points is in itself a spatially well-balanced sample. This latter property is extremely useful in adjusting the sample for the frame imperfections common in environmental sampling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/016214504000000250

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In each of the 39 parks, plot-monitoring locations were established using Generalized Random Tessellation Stratification (GRTS) to generate a spatially balanced, randomized sample across the parks' forests.

    “In each of the 39 parks, plot-monitoring locations were established using Generalized Random Tessellation Stratification (GRTS) to generate a spatially balanced, randomized sample across the parks' forests (Stevens & Olsen, 2004).”
  • Because of the algorithm used to determine plot locations, the plots sampled at COLO in cycle 1 were an unbiased, random sample.

    “However, because of the algorithm (Stevens & Olsen, 2004) used to determine plot locations, the plots sampled at COLO in cycle 1 were an unbiased, random sample, even though the estimates are likely to be less precise than if a full cycle had been completed.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, D. L., & Olsen, A. R.
Affiliations
Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2004-03
Volume
99
Issue
465
Pages
262-278
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2080439372
Cited by
1,294
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 49
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
Keywords
spatially balanced sampling, natural resources, systematic sampling, restricted randomization, auxiliary variables, finite population sampling, one-dimensional continua, environmental monitoring, survey design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review