The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variance Estimation Using Refitted Cross-Validation in Ultrahigh Dimensional Regression
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Variance estimation is a fundamental problem in statistical modelling. In ultrahigh dimensional linear regression where the dimensionality is much larger than the sample size, traditional variance estimation techniques are not applicable. Recent advances in variable selection in ultrahigh dimensional linear regression make this problem accessible. One of the major problems in ultrahigh dimensional regression is the high spurious correlation between the unobserved realized noise and some of the predictors. As a result, the realized noises are actually predicted when extra irrelevant variables are selected, leading to a serious underestimate of the level of noise. We propose a two-stage refitted procedure via a data splitting technique, called refitted cross-validation, to attenuate the influence of irrelevant variables with high spurious correlations. Our asymptotic results show that the resulting procedure performs as well as the oracle estimator, which knows in advance the mean regression function. The simulation studies lend further support to our theoretical claims. The naive two-stage estimator and the plug-in one-stage estimators using the lasso and smoothly clipped absolute deviation are also studied and compared. Their performances can be improved by the refitted cross-validation method proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence
Fan, J., Han, X., & Gu, W. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.720478 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Challenges of Big Data analysis
Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032 · Cited by 1,482
Self-citationA significance test for the lasso
Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1175 · Cited by 541
Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters
Newey, W. K., Hansen, C., Duflo, E., Robins, J., Chernozhukov, V., Demirer, M., & Chetverikov, D. (2017) · doi:10.1920/wp.cem.2017.2817 · Cited by 486
Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence
Fan, J., Han, X., & Gu, W. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.720478 · Cited by 227
Self-citationData Integration Challenges for Machine Learning in Precision Medicine
Martínez-García, M., & Hernández-Lemus, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.784455 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., Guo, S., & Hao, N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-65
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2111162388
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variance Estimation Using Refitted Cross-Validation in Ultrahigh Dimensional Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01005.x
- The paper
- Fan, J., Guo, S., & Hao, N. (2012). Variance Estimation Using Refitted Cross-Validation in Ultrahigh Dimensional Regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.