The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geostatistical Inference Under Preferential Sampling
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Geostatistics involves the fitting of spatially continuous models to spatially discrete data. Preferential sampling arises when the process that determines the data locations and the process being modelled are stochastically dependent. Conventional geostatistical methods assume, if only implicitly, that sampling is non-preferential. However, these methods are often used in situations where sampling is likely to be preferential. For example, in mineral exploration, samples may be concentrated in areas that are thought likely to yield high grade ore. We give a general expression for the likelihood function of preferentially sampled geostatistical data and describe how this can be evaluated approximately by using Monte Carlo methods. We present a model for preferential sampling and demonstrate through simulated examples that ignoring preferential sampling can lead to misleading inferences. We describe an application of the model to a set of biomonitoring data from Galicia, northern Spain, in which making allowance for preferential sampling materially changes the results of the analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
(2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,133
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cressie, N. (1992) · Terra Nova · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x · Cited by 8,823
Rue, H., Martino, S., & Chopin, N. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x · Cited by 5,279
Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.).
Therneau, T. M., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290358 · Cited by 4,907
Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0 · Cited by 3,089
Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns
(1986) · Environmental Software · doi:10.1016/0266-9838(86)90012-2 · Cited by 2,934
Ripley, B. D. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01615.x · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindström, J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x · Cited by 2,708
Metadata
- Authors
- Diggle, P. J., Menezes, R., & Su, T.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-232
- ISSN
- 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9876
- OpenAlex
- W2147351230
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 32.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geostatistical Inference Under Preferential Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00701.x
- The paper
- Diggle, P. J., Menezes, R., & Su, T.-L. (2010). Geostatistical Inference Under Preferential Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00701.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.