Cited by 100Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Approximate Bayesian Computation Using Indirect Inference

Open access
Drovandi, Christopher C., Pettitt, Anthony N., Faddy, Malcolm J.·2011·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics

Abstract

Summary: We present a novel approach for developing summary statistics for use in approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithms by using indirect inference. ABC methods are useful for posterior inference in the presence of an intractable likelihood function. In the indirect inference approach to ABC the parameters of an auxiliary model fitted to the data become the summary statistics. Although applicable to any ABC technique, we embed this approach within a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm that is completely adaptive and requires very little tuning. This methodological development was motivated by an application involving data on macroparasite population evolution modelled by a trivariate stochastic process for which there is no tractable likelihood function. The auxiliary model here is based on a beta–binomial distribution. The main objective of the analysis is to determine which parameters of the stochastic model are estimable from the observed data on mature parasite worms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00747.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reeves, R. W. and Pettitt, A. N. (2005) A theoretical framework for approximate Bayesian computation. In Proc. 20th Int. Wrkshp Statistical Modelling, Sydney (eds A. R. Francis, K. M. Matawie, A. Oshlack and G. K. Smyth), pp. 393-396. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drovandi, C. C., Pettitt, A. N., & Faddy, M. J.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Drovandi, Christopher C.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
Published
2011-01-13
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
317-337
ISSN
  • 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9876
OpenAlex
W2121052473
Cited by
100
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
approximate Bayesian computation, indirect inference, summary statistics, auxiliary model, sequential Monte Carlo, intractable likelihood, beta-binomial distribution, parameter identifiability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review