The Relationship Between Text Comprehension and Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition: A Matter of Topic Familiarity?
Abstract
The study reported in this article describes second language (L2) vocabulary learning outcomes associated with adult L2 reading comprehension processes, thus connecting L2 learning with the complex cognitive and linguistic processing involved in reading. The study aimed to determine whether background knowledge moderated the relationship between passage comprehension and lexical input processing outcomes, such as intake and receptive gain and retention of target‐word meanings. The primary theoretical contribution concerns the nature of the relationships that obtained between passage comprehension and lexical input processing. Overall, the results suggest that as learners become more efficient in engaging in the various processing activities required during L2 reading, they experience greater memory for linguistic elements encountered during reading, such as orthographic forms and semantic aspects of new lexical items. The results support connectionist models of L2 reading and conclusions concerning efficiency in lower level text processing (e.g., see Koda, 2005 ; Nassaji, 2002 ). Reading is a complex cognitive activity, involving simultaneous linguistic processing such as pattern recognition, letter identification, lexical access, concept activation, syntactic analysis, propositional encoding, sentence comprehension, and intersentence integration, as well as the activation of prior knowledge, information storage, and comprehension monitoring. The prior knowledge that is acces…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the vocabulary tests only included predefined target words, the study is unaware of any other learning gains.
“Because our vocabulary tests only included predefined TWs, we are unaware of any other learning gains (Pulido, 2007).”
From Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning (2014) · cites this paper as Pulido, 2007
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 4,910 · see citing works
Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement
Laufer, B. (2001) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Rott, S. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004039 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Ellis, N. C. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.004 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Pulido, D. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00217 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44357 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pulido, D.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pulido, Diana
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 155-199
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2332278089
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- second language reading comprehension, incidental vocabulary learning, prior knowledge, topic familiarity, vocabulary retention, bootstrapping, episodic memory, lexical access, adult L2 learners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review