Cited by 380Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence From Self‐Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks

Tremblay, Antoine, Derwing, Bruce, Libben, Gary, Westbury, Chris·2011·Language Learning

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which lexical bundles (LBs; i.e., frequently recurring strings of words that often span traditional syntactic boundaries) are stored and processed holistically. Three self‐paced reading experiments compared sentences containing LBs (e.g., in the middle of the ) and matched control sentence fragments (e.g., in the front of the ). LBs and sentences containing LBs were read faster than the control sentence fragments in all three experiments. Two follow‐up word and sentence recall experiments demonstrated that more sentences containing LBs were correctly remembered. Consistent with construction‐type models of language, these results suggest that regular multiword sequences leave memory traces in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More formulaic language is processed faster and acquired earlier than less formulaic language in both L1 and L2.

    “Studies have demonstrated that more formulaic language is processed faster and acquired earlier than less formulaic language both in L1 (e.g., Bannard & Matthews, 2008;Tremblay, Derwing, Libben, & Westbury, 2011) and in L2 (for review, see Siyanova-Chanturia & Pellicer-Sánchez, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Tremblay, Antoine
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-31
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
569-613
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W1549337014
Cited by
380
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
42.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
lexical bundles, multiword expressions, holistic processing, construction grammar, sentence processing, reading speed, sentence recall, word recall, memory traces, self-paced reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review