Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Task‐Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues

Robinson, Peter·2011·Language Learning

Abstract

Theoretically motivated, empirical research into task‐based language learning has been prompted by proposals for task‐based language teaching. In this review I describe early and more recent proposals for how task‐based learning can stimulate acquisition processes and the theoretical rationales that have guided research into them. I also describe taxonomies of task characteristics that have been proposed and claims made about the effects of task characteristics on interaction, attention to input, and speech production. I then relate the issues raised to findings described in the five empirical studies in this issue concerning the effects of pedagogic task design on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of learner language; the influence of individual differences in cognitive and motivational variables on task performance; the extent to which tasks, and teacher interventions, promote the quantity and quality of interaction that facilitate L2 learning; and the generalizability of task‐based learning research in laboratory contexts to instructed classroom settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 165 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Alcon‐Soler E., 2009, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 3
  2. Barkoczi I., 1981, A kreativitas vizsgalata [The examination of creativity]
  3. Candlin C., 1984, General English syllabus design, 29
  4. Costa P., 1985, The NEO Personality Inventory manual
  5. Council of Europe, 2001, Common European framework of reference for languages
  6. Cromer R., 1973, New perspectives in child development, 184
  7. 10.1017/S1366728998000042 · doi:10.1017/s1366728998000042
  8. 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ellis R., 2003, Task‐based language teaching and learning
  10. 10.1177/136216889900300303 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gibbons P., 2009, English learners, academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone
  12. Gilabert R., 2005, Task complexity and L2 oral narrative production
  13. Gilabert R., 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 44
  14. 10.1075/z.146 · doi:10.1075/z.146
  15. Harper R., 1984, ESP for the university. ELT Documents
  16. Housen A., 2009, Applied Linguistics
  17. Ishikawa T., 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 136
  18. Jupp T., 1975, Industrial English: An example of theory and practice in functional language teaching
  19. Kim Y., 2009, The role of task complexity and pair grouping on the occurrence of learning opportunities and L2 development
  20. Kuiken F., 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 117
  21. Leaver B., 2004, Task‐based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and programs
  22. Long M. H., 1985, Modeling and assessing second language acquisition, 77
  23. Long M. H., 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 15
  24. Mackey A., 2007, Conversational interaction in second language acquisition
  25. Mackey A., 2007, Conversational interaction in SLA, 407
  26. Merrill M. D., 2007, Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research, 265
  27. Neumann O., 1987, Perspectives on perception and action, 361
  28. Nuevo A., 2006, Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and interaction
  29. Nunan D., 1993, Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice, 55
  30. Perdue C., 1993, Adult language acquisition: Cross‐linguistic perspectives: Vol. 2. The results
  31. Pica T., 1993, Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, 1
  32. Robinson P., 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 7
  33. Romanko R., 2010, Task sequencing based on the Cognition Hypothesis, Language Teacher, 34, 9
  34. Schmidt R., 1986, Talking to learn: Conversation in second language learning, 237
  35. Shuell T., 1980, Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 2. Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem solving, 277
  36. Skehan P., 2008, Handbook of research in applied linguistics, 289
  37. Slobin D., 1993, Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: Vol. 2. The results, 239
  38. Snow R., 1987, Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analysis, 11
  39. Thomas M., 2010, Task‐based language learning and teaching with technology
  40. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1978.tb00728.x · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1978.tb00728.x
  41. 10.1017/S0272263100000231 · doi:10.1017/s0272263100000231
  42. 10.1515/ling.2003.028 · doi:10.1515/ling.2003.028
  43. White R., 1988, The ELT curriculum: Design, management, innovation

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, P.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
61
Issue
s1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W2144696526
Cited by
351
References
165
FWCI
180.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task‐Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x
The paper
Robinson, P. (2011). Task‐Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.