Cited by 60EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

An Exploration of L2 Teachers’ Use of Pedagogical Interventions Devised to Draw L2 Learners’ Attention to Form

Simard, Daphnée, Jean, Gladys·2011·Language Learning

Abstract

This descriptive observational study aimed at exploring the form‐focused instruction (FFI) interventions used by four French and four English as‐a‐second‐language high school teachers to draw their students’ attention to form. With the help of an Intervention‐on‐Form(s)‐Observation Scheme (IFOS) developed and tested for this purpose, each FFI intervention observed during 60 hours of video‐recorded class time was coded according to its type (e.g., corrective feedback, explanation, enhancement, form‐oriented exercises) and its related characteristics (e.g., linguistic focus, interactional pattern, source of the intervention). The results show that grammar‐oriented interventions are rather frequent in these second‐language classes and that some differences in preferences of intervention types exist in the two contexts. Although FFI interventions are more frequent in the English classes observed, the overall time spent on FFI is significantly higher in the French classes. The reasons for this as well as details regarding the characteristics of the interventions coded through the use of the IFOS will be discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00656.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simard & Jean (2011) confirmed that vocabulary was the most attended linguistic aspect in L2 classes of young learners (Grade 9 to Grade 12) of English and French.

    “a finding that was confirmed by Simard & Jean (2011) who observed L2 classes of young learners (Grade 9 to Grade 12) of English and French.”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Simard & Jean 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simard, D., & Jean, G.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Simard, Daphnée
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
759-785
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W1913483794
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
form-focused instruction, second language teachers, pedagogical intervention, corrective feedback, French as a second language, English as a second language, high school language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review