The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BEHAVIORAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION IN CONTINUOUS TIME
Open accessAbstract
This paper formulates and studies a general continuous‐time behavioral portfolio selection model under Kahneman and Tversky's (cumulative) prospect theory, featuring S‐shaped utility (value) functions and probability distortions. Unlike the conventional expected utility maximization model, such a behavioral model could be easily mis‐formulated (a.k.a. ill‐posed) if its different components do not coordinate well with each other. Certain classes of an ill‐posed model are identified. A systematic approach, which is fundamentally different from the ones employed for the utility model, is developed to solve a well‐posed model, assuming a complete market and general Itô processes for asset prices. The optimal terminal wealth positions, derived in fairly explicit forms, possess surprisingly simple structure reminiscent of a gambling policy betting on a good state of the world while accepting a fixed, known loss in case of a bad one. An example with a two‐piece CRRA utility is presented to illustrate the general results obtained, and is solved completely for all admissible parameters. The effect of the behavioral criterion on the risky allocations is finally discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Theory of games and economic behavior
(2019) · 100 Years of Math Milestones · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,632
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,535
The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
Harrison, R. W., von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1945) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1232672 · Cited by 5,133
Choquet, G. (1954) · Annales de l'Institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.53 · Cited by 4,204
Allais, M. (1953) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907921 · Cited by 4,112
The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk
Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/256692 · Cited by 3,077
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, H., & Yu Zhou, X.
- Venue
- Mathematical Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-426
- ISSN
- 0960-1627 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9965
- OpenAlex
- W2134306794
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BEHAVIORAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION IN CONTINUOUS TIME. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2008.00339.x
- The paper
- Jin, H., & Yu Zhou, X. (2008). BEHAVIORAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION IN CONTINUOUS TIME. Mathematical Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2008.00339.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.