Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleeping giants? Fired workbloggers and labour organisation

Schoneboom, Abigail·2011·New Technology, Work and Employment

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-005x.2010.00254.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Albright, 2008, ‘Contending Rationality, Leadership, and Collective Struggle: The 2006 Justice for Janitors Campaign at the University of Miami’, Labor Studies Journal, 33, 63, 10.1177/0160449X07311856 · DOI
  2. Beaulieu, 2004, ‘Mediating Ethnography: Objectivity and the Making of Ethnographies of the Internet’, Social Epistemology, 18, 139, 10.1080/0269172042000249264 · DOI
  3. Carter, 2003, ‘The Polyphonic Spree: The Case of the Liverpool Dockers’, Industrial Relations, 34, 290, 10.1111/1468-2338.00276 · DOI
  4. Diamond, 2002, ‘Will Unionism Prosper in Cyberspace? The Promise of the Internet for Employee Organization’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 569, 10.1111/1467-8543.00247 · DOI
  5. Ellis, 2009, Work Matters, 250, 10.1007/978-1-137-03671-1_15 · DOI
  6. Fantasia, 2004, Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement, 10.1525/9780520937710 · DOI
  7. Gordon , J. 2005a ‘A Press Release from My Union, the Rba’ The Woolamaloo Gazette http://www.woolamaloo.org.uk/2005_04_01_archive.htm
  8. Greene, 2003, ‘Commentary: E-Collectivism and Distributed Discourse: New Opportunities for Trade Union Democracy’, Industrial Relations Journal, 34, 282, 10.1111/1468-2338.00275 · DOI
  9. Hakken, 1999, Cyborgs@Cyberspace?: An Ethnographer Looks to the Future
  10. Heery, 2004, The Future of Worker Representation, 1
  11. Kaiser, 2007, ‘Weblog-Technology As A Trigger to Elicit Passion for Knowledge’, Organization, 14, 391, 10.1177/1350508407076151 · DOI
  12. Lee, 2004, Labour and Globalisation, 71
  13. Martinez Lucio, 2003, ‘New Communications Systems and Trade Union Politics: A Case Study of Spanish Trade Unions and the Role of the Internet’, Industrial Relations Journal, 34, 334, 10.1111/1468-2338.00279 · DOI
  14. Pliskin, 1997, ‘E-Mail as A Weapon in An Industrial Dispute’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 12, 3, 10.1111/1468-005X.00018 · DOI
  15. Richards, 2008, ‘ “Because I Need Somewhere to Vent”: The Expression of Conflict through Workblogs’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 23, 95, 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00205.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Saundry, 2007, ‘Broadcasting Discontent-Freelancers, Trade Unions and the Internet’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 22, 178, 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00192.x · DOI
  17. Schoneboom, 2007, ‘Diary of a Working Boy: Creative Resistance among Anonymous Workbloggers’, Ethnography, 8, 403, 10.1177/1466138107083559 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schoneboom, A.
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-25
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
17-28
ISSN
0268-1072
Cited by
20
References
1
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 1649 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.