The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE POWER OF COINTEGRATION TESTS
Open accessAbstract
A cointegration test statistic based upon estimation of an error correction model can be approximately normally distributed when no cointegration is present. By contrast, the equivalent Dickey-Fuller statistic applied to residuals from a static relationship has a non-standard asymptotic distribution. When cointegration exists, the error-correction test generally is more powerful than the Dickey-Fuller test. These differences arise because the latter imposes a possibly invalid common factor restriction. The issue is general and has ramifications for system-based cointegration tests. Monte Carlo analysis and an empirical study of U.K. money demand demonstrate the differences in power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS
Johansen, S. (1988) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 · Cited by 17,027
Cited by
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data*
Westerlund, J. (2007) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x · Cited by 6,113
Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014) · Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9 · Cited by 3,835
Does financial development cause economic growth? Time-series evidence from 16 countries
Demetriades, P. O., & Hussein, K. A. (1996) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00421-x · Cited by 1,539
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Galbraith, J. W., & Hendry, D. F. (1993) · Co-integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data · doi:10.1093/0198288107.003.0004 · Cited by 872
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kremers, J. J. M., Ericsson, N. R., & Dolado, J. J.
- Venue
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-348
- ISSN
- 0305-9049 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0084
- OpenAlex
- W2126322608
- Cited by
- 1,302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 109.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE POWER OF COINTEGRATION TESTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00005.x
- The paper
- Kremers, J. J. M., Ericsson, N. R., & Dolado, J. J. (1992). THE POWER OF COINTEGRATION TESTS. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.