The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jackknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Nonlinear Panel Models
Abstract
Fixed effects estimators of panel models can be severely biased because of the well-known incidental parameters problem. We show that this bias can be reduced by using a panel jackknife or an analytical bias correction motivated by large T. We give bias corrections for averages over the fixed effects, as well as model parameters. We find large bias reductions from using these approaches in examples. We consider asymptotics where T grows with n, as an approximation to the properties of the estimators in econometric applications. We show that if T grows at the same rate as n, the fixed effects estimator is asymptotically biased, so that asymptotic confidence intervals are incorrect, but that they are correct for the panel jackknife. We show T growing faster than n-super-1/3 suffices for correctness of the analytic correction, a property we also conjecture for the jackknife. Copyright The Econometric Society 2004.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Panel data and unobservable individual effects
Hausman, J., & Taylor, W. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90085-3 · Cited by 2,309
Testing for neglected heterogeneity
Chesher, A. (1984) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911188 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6135 · Cited by 1,690
Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels
Wooldridge, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.12.010 · Cited by 661
Grouped Patterns of Heterogeneity in Panel Data
Bonhomme, S., & Manresa, E. (2015) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11319 · Cited by 451
(2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.014 · Cited by 319
Asymptotic properties of a robust variance matrix estimator for panel data when is large
Hansen, C. B. (2007) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.009 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, J., & Newey, W.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1295-1319
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2162250095
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jackknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Nonlinear Panel Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00533.x
- The paper
- Hahn, J., & Newey, W. (2004). Jackknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Nonlinear Panel Models. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00533.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.