Consistent Testing of Cointegrating Relationships
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we investigate methods for testing the existence of a cointegration relationship among the components of a nonstationary fractionally integrated (NFI) vector time series. Our framework generalizes previous studies restricted to unit root integrated processes and permits simultaneous analysis of spurious and cointegrated NFI vectors. We propose a modified F-statistic, based on a particular studentization, which converges weakly under both hypotheses, despite the fact that OLS estimates are only consistent under cointegration. This statistic leads to a Wald-type test of cointegration when combined with a narrow band GLS-type estimate. Our semiparametric methodology allows consistent testing of the spurious regression hypothesis against the alternative of fractional cointegration without prior knowledge on the memory of the original series, their short run properties, the cointegrating vector, or the degree of cointegration. This semiparametric aspect of the modelization does not lead to an asymptotic loss of power, permitting the Wald statistic to diverge faster under the alternative of cointegration than when testing for a hypothesized cointegration vector. In our simulations we show that the method has comparable power to customary procedures under the unit root cointegration setup, and maintains good properties in a general framework where other methods may fail. We illustrate our method testing the cointegration hypothesis of nominal GNP and simple-sum (M1, M2, M3) monetary aggregates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Marmol and Velasco (2004) test rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration between paired time series in 22 cases out of 37.
“The Marmol and Velasco (2004) test rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration between paired time series in 22 cases out of 37.”
From Sanctions and Russian online prices (2024) · cites this paper as Marmol and Velasco (2004)
Cites
Determination of cointegrating rank in fractional systems
Robinson, P. M., & Yajima, Y. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00096-3 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nielsen, M. Ø., & Shimotsu, K. (2007) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.008 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Sanctions and Russian online prices
Benchimol, J., & Palumbo, L. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.07.013 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marmol, F., & Velasco, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- ORCID
- Velasco, Carlos
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1809-1844
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2081161335
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Econometrica (publishedVersion)
- e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
- Keywords
- cointegration tests, fractional cointegration, spurious regression, Wald test, semiparametric estimation, unit root processes, monetary aggregates, cointegrating vectors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review