Cited by 50Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies

Consistent Testing of Cointegrating Relationships

Open access
Marmol, Francesc, Velasco, Carlos·2004·Econometrica

Abstract

In this paper we investigate methods for testing the existence of a cointegration relationship among the components of a nonstationary fractionally integrated (NFI) vector time series. Our framework generalizes previous studies restricted to unit root integrated processes and permits simultaneous analysis of spurious and cointegrated NFI vectors. We propose a modified F-statistic, based on a particular studentization, which converges weakly under both hypotheses, despite the fact that OLS estimates are only consistent under cointegration. This statistic leads to a Wald-type test of cointegration when combined with a narrow band GLS-type estimate. Our semiparametric methodology allows consistent testing of the spurious regression hypothesis against the alternative of fractional cointegration without prior knowledge on the memory of the original series, their short run properties, the cointegrating vector, or the degree of cointegration. This semiparametric aspect of the modelization does not lead to an asymptotic loss of power, permitting the Wald statistic to diverge faster under the alternative of cointegration than when testing for a hypothesized cointegration vector. In our simulations we show that the method has comparable power to customary procedures under the unit root cointegration setup, and maintains good properties in a general framework where other methods may fail. We illustrate our method testing the cointegration hypothesis of nominal GNP and simple-sum (M1, M2, M3) monetary aggregates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00554.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Marmol and Velasco (2004) test rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration between paired time series in 22 cases out of 37.

    “The Marmol and Velasco (2004) test rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration between paired time series in 22 cases out of 37.”

    From Sanctions and Russian online prices (2024) · cites this paper as Marmol and Velasco (2004)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marmol, F., & Velasco, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Econometrica
Published
2004-11
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1809-1844
ISSN
  • 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0262
OpenAlex
W2081161335
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Econometrica (publishedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Keywords
cointegration tests, fractional cointegration, spurious regression, Wald test, semiparametric estimation, unit root processes, monetary aggregates, cointegrating vectors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review