The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 · Cited by 4,816
The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082976 · Cited by 3,375
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1994.1021 · Cited by 2,366
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
Camerer, C. F., Hogarth, R. M., Budescu, D. V., & Eckel, C. (1999) · Elicitation of Preferences · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_2 · Cited by 1,545
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1023/a:1007850605129 · Cited by 1,428
Rubinstein, A. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4702.001.0001 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationSelten, R. (1988) · Theory and Decision Library C · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7774-8_2 · Cited by 917
Finite automata play the repeated prisoner's dilemma
Rubinstein, A. (1986) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(86)90021-9 · Cited by 594
Self-citationTen Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions
Goeree, J. K., & Holt, C. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1402 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11467 · Cited by 1,334
Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation
Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., & Greene, J. D. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4677 · Cited by 720
Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference
Krajbich, I., Bartling, B., Hare, T., & Fehr, E. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8455 · Cited by 353
Intuition and Deliberation: Two Systems for Strategizing in the Brain
Kuo, W.-J., Sjöström, T., Chen, Y.-P., Wang, Y.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165598 · Cited by 152
Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants
Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171252 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubinstein, A.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-21
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 523
- Pages
- 1243-1259
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W3122740798
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 25.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.x
- The paper
- Rubinstein, A. (2007). Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
