The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009
Open accessAbstract
Background and purpose: We have revised the previous EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain (NP) assessment, which aimed to provide recommendations for the diagnostic process, screening tools and questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing (QST), microneurography, pain‐related reflexes and evoked potentials, functional neuroimaging and skin biopsy. Methods: We have checked and rated the literature published in the period 2004–2009, according to the EFNS method of classification for diagnostic procedures. Results: Most of the previous recommendations were reinforced by the new studies. The main revisions relate to: (i) the new definition of NP and a diagnostic grading system; (ii) several new validated clinical screening tools that identify NP components, and questionnaires which assess the different types of NP; (iii) recent high‐quality studies on laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) and skin biopsy. Conclusions: History and bedside examination are still fundamental to a correct diagnosis, whilst screening tools and questionnaires are useful in indicating probable NP; QST is also useful for indicating the latter, and to assess provoked pains and treatment response. Amongst laboratory tests, LEPs are the best tool for assessing Aδ pathway dysfunction, and skin biopsy for assessing neuropathies with distal loss of unmyelinated nerve fibres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,845
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms
Merskey, H. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,362
Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease
Apkarian, A. V., Bushnell, M. C., Treede, R., & Zubieta, J. (2005) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001 · Cited by 3,126
Self-citationTreede (2008) · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000282763.29778.59 · Cited by 2,746
Bouhassira, D., Attal, N., Alchaar, H., Boureau, F., Brochet, B., Bruxelle, J., Cunin, G., Fermanian, J., Ginies, P., Grun-Overdyking, A., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010 · Cited by 2,741
Self-citationRolke, R., Baron, R., Maier, C., Tölle, T. R., Treede, D. R., Beyer, A., Binder, A., Birbaumer, N., Birklein, F., Bötefür, I. C., et al. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041 · Cited by 2,609
Self-citationFreynhagen, R., Baron, R., Gockel, U., & Tölle, T. R. (2006) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/030079906x132488 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationFunctional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000)
Peyron, R., Laurent, B., & García-Larrea, L. (2000) · Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0987-7053(00)00227-6 · Cited by 2,171
Classification of Chronic Pain—Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms
Harvey, A. M. (1995) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199506000-00024 · Cited by 1,779
Cited by
Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain
Woolf, C. J. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030 · Cited by 4,771
Colloca, L., Ludman, T., Bouhassira, D., Baron, R., Dickenson, A. H., Yarnitsky, D., Freeman, R., Truini, A., Attal, N., Finnerup, N. B., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.2 · Cited by 2,058
Self-citationEFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Baron, R., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., & Nurmikko, T. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x · Cited by 1,873
Self-citationNeuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment
Baron, R., Binder, A., & Wasner, G. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70143-5 · Cited by 1,816
Self-citationTesfaye, S., Vileikyte, L., Rayman, G., Sindrup, S. H., Perkins, B. A., Baconja, M., Vinik, A. I., Boulton, A. J. M., & Neuropathy, O. B. O. T. T. E. P. O. D. (2011) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.1225 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruccu, G., Sommer, C., Anand, P., Attal, N., Baron, R., Garcia‐Larrea, L., Haanpaa, M., Jensen, T. S., Serra, J., & Treede, R. ‐.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1010-1018
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W1540095762
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 28.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x
- The paper
- Cruccu, G., Sommer, C., Anand, P., Attal, N., Baron, R., Garcia‐Larrea, L., Haanpaa, M., Jensen, T. S., Serra, J., & Treede, R. ‐. (2010). EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
