Cited by 2,280Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

pain DETECT : a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain

Open access
Freynhagen, Rainer, Baron, Ralf, Gockel, Ulrich, Tölle, Thomas R.·2006·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nociceptive and neuropathic components both contribute to pain. Since these components require different pain management strategies, correct pain diagnosis before and during treatment is highly desirable. As low back pain (LBP) patients constitute an important subgroup of chronic pain patients, we addressed the following issues: (i) to establish a simple, validated screening tool to detect neuropathic pain (NeP) components in chronic LBP patients, (ii) to determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain components in LBP in a large-scale survey, and (iii) to determine whether LBP patients with an NeP component suffer from worse, or different, co-morbidities. METHODS: In co-operation with the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain we developed and validated the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) in a prospective, multicentre study and subsequently applied it to approximately 8000 LBP patients. RESULTS: The PD-Q is a reliable screening tool with high sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive accuracy; these were 84% in a palm-top computerised version and 85%, 80% and 83%, respectively, in a corresponding pencil-and-paper questionnaire. In an unselected cohort of chronic LBP patients, 37% were found to have predominantly neuropathic pain. Patients with NeP showed higher ratings of pain intensity, with more (and more severe) co-morbidities such as depression, panic/anxiety and sleep disorders. This also affected functionality and use of health-care resources. On the basis of given prevalence of LBP in the general population, we calculated that 14.5% of all female and 11.4% of all male Germans suffer from LBP with a predominant neuropathic pain component. CONCLUSION: Simple, patient-based, easy-to-use screening questionnaires can determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain components both in individual LBP patients and in heterogeneous cohorts of such patients. Since NeP correlates with more intense pain, more severe co-morbidity and poorer quality of life, accurate diagnosis is a milestone in choosing appropriate therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/030079906x132488

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomization uses stratified blocks by sex/gender and pain type to balance these factors across the three arms.

    “Participants will be randomized to stratified blocks based on sex/gender and pain type (neuropathic, non-neuropathic, mixed or undetermined), assessed via the Pain DETECT[50] measure and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS)[51] to ensure uniform distribution of these factors across the three conditions.”
  • The BPI is a popular well-validated measure of pain severity used in research and clinical settings.

    “This is a popular well-validated measure of pain severity used in research and clinical settings.”

    From Risk Factors for Self-Harm Ideation among Persons Treated with Opioids for Chronic Low Back Pain (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion describes painDETECT (PD-Q) as a validated screening tool for neuropathic pain, not the BPI as a measure of pain severity. Searches for “BPI,” “Brief Pain Inventory,” and the claimed description found no passage in our copy addressing the BPI’s validation or use. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Baron R, Binder A. How neuropathic is sciatica? The mixed pain concept. Orthopade 2004;33:568-75
  2. [19]19. Neuhauser H, Ellert U, Ziese T. Chronic back pain in the general population in Germany 2002/2003: prevalence and highly affected population groups. Gesundheitswesen 2005;67: 685-93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freynhagen, R., Baron, R., Gockel, U., & Tölle, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Pfizer (Germany) (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Freynhagen, Rainer
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2006-08-29
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1911-1920
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W2154693681
Cited by
2,280
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 68
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
neuropathic pain, low back pain, chronic pain, painDETECT questionnaire, screening questionnaire, prevalence, comorbidities, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, pain intensity, quality of life, health care utilization, pain diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Comorbidity, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review