The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework
Abstract
A new conceptual framework to define and differentiate among diverse forms of employee ownership is developed. Two central rights associated with ownership, return and control rights, are identified. Their impact on individual motivation, individual performance, organizational structural variables and organizational performance is evaluated. We show how, over certain ranges of combinations of control and return rights, the relationship between alternative ownership arrangements and organizational performance may be nonlinear. The implications for the introduction of employee ownership and the evaluation of empirical work are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does governance confer organisational resilience? Evidence from UK employee owned businesses
Lampel, J., Bhalla, A., & Jha, P. P. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.06.009 · Cited by 135
On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory
Battilana, J., Beckman, C. M., & Yen, J. (2025) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392251322430 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- BEN‐NER, A., & JONES, D. C.
- Venue
- Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-554
- ISSN
- 0019-8676 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-232X
- OpenAlex
- W1963661304
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1995.tb00387.x
- The paper
- BEN‐NER, A., & JONES, D. C. (1995). Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1995.tb00387.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
